You’ll all notice the Vice President’s piece in the New York Times this morning, which is a fine summary of what remains to be done in Iraq, but neglects to mention that the new Iraqi government will include the Sadrists, a violently anti-American political force that Washington tried to block from joining the governing coalition. Does this presage a changed American attitude, or just a polite effort to put the best face on things?
P.S.: Note the vigorous support for the “National Council for Higher Policies” (it comes out differently in every translation), which is the main thing Allawi gained from eight months of negotiation.
Americans thought they would do better with a convicted felon, womanizer, racist, and flim-flam man.…
Israelis need to elect a government committed to democracy in order to get to the…
I'll be speaking at Georgetown 12 noon-2 pm on my latest book: Strengthening International Regimes:…
All have an interest in preventing Iran from getting nuclear weapons, in stabilizing Syria, and…
Can fragmented Israeli democracy, American pro-Israel diplomats, and a Saudi autocrat combine to produce a…
Biden is pushing "strategic dialogues" with both Belgrade and Pristina. That's not the worst idea…