Time to act

Here is President Obama’s statement from three days ago:

I am deeply concerned by reports of violence in Bahrain, Libya and Yemen. The United States condemns the use of violence by governments against peaceful protesters in those countries and wherever else it may occur. We express our condolences to the family and friends of those who have been killed during the demonstrations. Wherever they are, people have certain universal rights including the right to peaceful assembly. The United States urges the governments of Bahrain, Libya and Yemen to show restraint in responding to peaceful protests, and to respect the rights of their people.

This statement had a good impact in Bahrain, where the monarchy saved its skin by withdrawing army and policy from Pearl square and allowing the Crown Prince to make a truly conciliatory statement.

But today was a day of carnage in Libya according to many reports: jet fighters strafing demonstrators, thugs shooting into crowds, perhaps 250 fatalities. While the State Department has expressed “grave concern” and ordered an evacuation of its own personnel, President Obama has been silent and no specific counter-action, even an emergency meeting of the UN Security Council, has been announced. We need to hear from the President what he is prepared to do.

It is time to act.  The Twittersphere is full of recommendations for a no-fly zone, which would be fine by me if the UN Security Council can move quickly to order one.  I am not convinced that unilateral U.S. action along those lines would be welcomed even among the protesters in Libya, and we should note that it would prevent defections like the two colonels who flew to Malta today. But letting it be known that one or more aircraft carriers is moving towards North Africa even before the UNSC acts could inhibit some of Gaddafi’s worst behavior.

What else could be done?  The Arab League is said to be meeting tomorrow to discuss Libya.  That is only a good thing if they drop their usual hesitancy to criticize a reigning sovereign and denounce Gaddafi’s attacks on his own people.  I hope the Americans are demarching (that diplomatese for talking to/asking) every Arab League capital by morning pointing out that what Gaddafi is doing is counterproductive and will rouse the public in many other countries.

In any event, I trust the Americans are making it clear in Tripoli that what is going on needs to stop right away.  It is not only Libya that is at risk–if Gaddafi succeeds in his effort to repress the demonstrators, which is possible though unlikely–you’ll see every tyrant in the Middle East copying his lead.  That would not be a pretty picture.

PS:  A few more things the UNSC could do:  freeze assets and ban travel of regime principals, prohibit arms sales, send the Secretary General to Tripoli to negotiate for deployment of a group of observers.

admin

Share
Published by
admin

Recent Posts

Four more years is four too many

Americans thought they would do better with a convicted felon, womanizer, racist, and flim-flam man.…

23 hours ago

Beyond ceasefire, what can really happen?

Israelis need to elect a government committed to democracy in order to get to the…

3 days ago

Come for lunch, stay for the talk!

I'll be speaking at Georgetown 12 noon-2 pm on my latest book: Strengthening International Regimes:…

5 days ago

An opportunity that may be missed

All have an interest in preventing Iran from getting nuclear weapons, in stabilizing Syria, and…

5 days ago

Democracy doesn’t favor a serious peace

Can fragmented Israeli democracy, American pro-Israel diplomats, and a Saudi autocrat combine to produce a…

6 days ago

Things in the Balkans can get worse

Biden is pushing "strategic dialogues" with both Belgrade and Pristina. That's not the worst idea…

7 days ago