Month: May 2011

Let’s not make mistakes now

Relief, even pleasure, I understand, but there is a real risk of drawing incorrect conclusions from the killing of Osama bin Laden.  Here are just of few of the mistakes that I already see being made:

  • Triumphalism.  This is not an American triumph of historic proportions.  It is the culmination of 10 years of assiduous intelligence work that proves how really difficult it is to find an individual, though once you’ve found him killing is relatively easy.
  • Justice.  I might regard his death as just, but this is not justice, as the President claimed.  Justice requires a process, even in a case as apparently justified as this one.
  • Victory in the war on terror.  Obviously there is the real potential for terror to continue and even escalate.  Just as important:  terror is a means, like military force.  Victory is when ends triumph, not means:  democracy over totalitarianism, for example.  “War on terror” is the wrong framing, as we say in the conflict management business.
  • Pakistan was cooperating with al Qaeda, or on the contrary deserves credit.  We can’t be sure of either, yet.  But they certainly have some explaining to do, since bin Laden was “hiding” near Islamabad in a military-oriented community.  President Obama suggested that their intelligence cooperation was helpful, but it is not clear what that means.
  • Pakistan did or did not know about the operation.  I find that it hard to believe that Pakistan did not know, but if they didn’t it tells us something about their military and intelligence capabilities.  More than likely they were told something was happening and to keep out of the way, but they may not have been told exactly what.

My son, Adam Serwer at the American Prospect, reminds on Twitter that I predicted some time ago that bin Laden would not be found in a cave, or in a hole like Saddam Hussein, but rather in a luxury villa.  I got that right.

Now it is important to restrain ourselves and treat this event as the death of a mass murderer whose minions continue to threaten Muslims and non-Muslims alike.  We need to stay grounded and figure out, better than we have for the past ten years, what will reduce the risks we face.  Maybe it is less war–on terror, or in Iraq and Afghanistan–and more assiduous intelligence work.  Let’s not make mistakes now.

PS:  I’d like to agree with Lawrence Wright, who says “Democracy and civil society are the cure for the chronic misery of Muslim countries that has fed the rise of Islamic extremism.”  But the fact is that Pakistan has quite a bit of democracy and civil society.  Islamic extremism, which once had little purchase there, is definitely on the rise.  Certainly it is true that the Arab Spring offers an alternative narrative to young Muslims, but societies in transition to democracy are notoriously prone to war and other pathologies.  I don’t think we can disband the special forces and rely on civil society to restrain extremism.

PPS:  Far worse is Jennifer Rubin, whose celebratory triumphalism and crediting of harsh interrogation techniques (with no evidence) seems calculated to appeal to her public’s worst instincts while offending the rest of the world as much as possible.  I needn’t even mention her crediting of George W. Bush, whose efforts she says were far more important than you know whose.

PPPS: For those, like me, who did not wait up for the official announcement last night:

PPPPS: See also http://yfrog.com/gzlctaoj

Tags : , ,

Yemen at stake

President Saleh has refused to sign the agreement to step down in 30 days in return for immunity from prosecution.  This is not really a surprise.  He is notoriously slippery and has wiggled out of several previous promises to give up power.

Now the question is what the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) will do.  Its oil-endowed members (Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, United Arab Emirates, Qatar and Oman) were to be the guarantors of the agreement the GCC had negotiated with Saleh and the opposition political parties.  Individually and collectively they presumably have a good deal of leverage over Saleh.  Will the GCC show its teeth, as it did by deploying troops in Bahrain?  Or will it roll over and play dead, leaving Saleh to see if he can defeat the protests, now that he has rejected the deal with the political parties?

It is easy to imagine that Saleh is watching Bashar al Assad’s repression of protests in Syria and Muammar Gaddafi’s war against Libya’s population and wondering, “why can’t I survive if they can?”  Of course the right answer to that question is that none of them should remain in power:  each has delegitimized his own regime and by all rights should step aside.

But life is not often fair.  I am reasonably confident that Gaddafi is finished, sooner or later, but the jury is still out on Bashar, who seems willing to imitate if not rival his father in killing and arresting Syrians.  Saleh has so far been less heavy-handed in Yemen, but I wouldn’t put it past him to double down and try to intimidate the protesters.  They have proven adept and savvy so far; let’s hope they can maintain their good humor, massive presence and commitment to nonviolence.  They merit success.

Tags : , ,
Tweet