Herewith an interview I did for Bekim Greicevci of Kosovo’s Daily Express on the situation in northern Kosovo (you can play the Kosovo band Gillespie, subject of a nice piece on PRI’s The World yesterday here in DC, while reading):
Gillespie – E Di (Official Video)
Gillespie | Myspace Music Videos
There is no question in my mind about the right of a sovereign state to control its own borders, but Belgrade has not recognized Kosovo’s sovereignty. That is the underlying problem that needs to be resolved. It will not be solved quickly or easily. Nor will it be solved by unilateral actions or the use of force. Belgrade’s acceptance of Kosovo’s customs documents would be a good first step in the right direction and ameliorate the situation in the north.
EULEX reflects division within the EU, in particular between the five non-recognizing states and the 22 recognizing states. As control of the border is a sovereign function, it should surprise no one that the five non-recognizing states do not want to be responsible for establishing sovereign controls there.
While I understand those who may not want to help Kosovo establish sovereign controls on the northern border, I find it hard to understand those who want a return to the previous situation. Belgrade cannot claim that UN Security Council resolution 1244 gave either Serbian officials or local hoodlums the right to control what it regards as the boundary between Kosovo and Serbia proper. That responsibility clearly should lie with the Kosovo institutions. The status quo ante should not be restored.
I think there is no question but that Belgrade’s goal is partition. It has been for a long time. Partition is a grave danger to peace and security throughout the Balkans, as it may precipitate problems in Macedonia, Bosnia, southern Serbia and Sandjak. Belgrade needs to get back to the Ahtisaari plan, read it carefully and specify precisely what more it wants than what is already provided there for the north.
Washington and Brussels would like to see this problem resolved quickly and peacefully, with no partition. It is not clear whether those goals are all compatible. They are going to need to work hard to convince Pristina not to make unilateral moves and Belgrade to give up on partition.
You make peace with your enemies, not with your friends. Borko Stefanovic is not being helpful, but you still have to talk with him. I imagine he has some complaints about things that are said in Pristina, too. The EU-facilitated dialogue is the only show in town—it is important to try to make it a success. The Americans will look for a peaceful and mutually acceptable outcome and back it fully.
The Europeans have the ultimate leverage: control over Belgrade’s EU candidacy and the date for starting negotiations. Stefanovic, or one of his bosses, needs to worry that those northern Kosovo roadblocks might become obstacles on Serbia’s path to EU membership.
Al Sharaa won't be able to decide, but his decisions will influence the outcome. Let's…
Transparently assembling all the material and technology needed for nuclear weapons might serve Iran well…
The fall of the Assad regime in Syria was swift. Now comes the hard part:…
Good luck and timing are important factors in diplomacy. It's possible Grenell will not fail…
There are big opportunities in Syria to make a better life for Syrians. Not to…
HTS-led forces have done a remarkable job in a short time. The risks of fragmentation…