Useless idiots have their purposes
Tweeter Hani Sabra:
there’s no nice way to say this, so here goes: anybody who thinks damascus would abide by the plan is total, useless idiot.
I agree with the sentiment, but why then did the Arab League propose the plan, and why did Bashar al Assad accept it?
They aren’t idiots, and the plan serves their useful purposes. The Arab League is certainly not on the side of the protesters. Most of its members either already have, or would if the occasion arose, repress demonstrations like the ones occurring in Syria.
What the Arab League is trying to do is help Bashar. He understood the gesture: you pretend to give me a plan to end the violence, and I’ll pretend to end the violence. No one is fooled, but it at least buys a week, two or even three while the Arab League pretends to wait for implementation and Bashar pretends to implement. In the meanwhile, a lot of demonstrators get killed, hurt and discouraged. Maybe some of them will even agree to the dialogue with the government proposed in the plan. That would buy some more time.
What happens when this charade gets boring? Likely not much, unless the Arab League or the Security Council can be convinced to take more serious action. As regular readers know, my favorite proposal is diplomatic observers. If the Arab League were serious, it would have insisted on verification.
Why would Bashar accept? Only if he thinks he has things under control and can rehabilitate himself internationally by agreeing. What if he rejects? That at least shows him up for the lying bastard he is.
One thought on “Useless idiots have their purposes”
Comments are closed.
The best way to change things is by changing the political culture. Our intervention in Libya has certainly not done that. It has taught people that power still comes from the mouth of a gun – and that is exactly how Assad works now.
It is not foolish to talk with Assad. It is foolish to expect that you can convince him and his supporters within a few hours that he will have to do everything different. That will take a long time.
Compare it to the Occupy movement now or the hippies in he 1960s. The near universal reaction of our establishment both then and now was and is repression. But much of the ideas of the 1960s were later adopted and I expect something similar with many of the ideas of the Occupy movements. That is also how change will work in Syria. The story that peaceful protest is more effective in the long run that violent protest is well known.
BTW do you really believe diplomatic observers have much credibility after CIA agent Walkers work in Kosovo and the more recent Western intrigues in Ivory Coast?