This is a piece of mine Reuters published this afternoon under the headline “Here’s how to handle Syria”:
There is no alternative in sight to the existing Security Council resolutions. Syria is not on the NATO summit agenda this weekend in Chicago. The Americans continue to need the Russians “on side” for nuclear talks with Iran that resume next week in Baghdad. Unilateral American action on Syria is not in the cards. Europe is preoccupied with its own financial crisis and is unable to act without American help. Qatari and Saudi weapons entering Syria are likely to increase violence and worsen sectarian tensions.
So what is to be done? Here are some ideas for the Obama administration:
When the Security Council approved the Annan plan, the United States called for “swift and meaningful consequences … should the regime continue to flout its obligations.” The best way of getting those consequences approved in the Security Council is to support full implementation of the Annan plan. Then the United States can go to the Council in mid-July, when the observer mission has to be renewed, arguing that despite its sincere efforts, Bashar al-Assad has defied the international community and needs to be taught a lesson.
PHOTO: Anti-government protesters attend the funeral of Mahmoud Al Moustafa, whom protesters said was killed by forces loyal to Syria’s President Bashar al-Assad, in Deir Al Zour, May 15, 2012. REUTERS/Handout
Americans thought they would do better with a convicted felon, womanizer, racist, and flim-flam man.…
Israelis need to elect a government committed to democracy in order to get to the…
I'll be speaking at Georgetown 12 noon-2 pm on my latest book: Strengthening International Regimes:…
All have an interest in preventing Iran from getting nuclear weapons, in stabilizing Syria, and…
Can fragmented Israeli democracy, American pro-Israel diplomats, and a Saudi autocrat combine to produce a…
Biden is pushing "strategic dialogues" with both Belgrade and Pristina. That's not the worst idea…