Bearly civil

Russia is not  America’s “number one geopolitical foe,” as Governor Romney suggested in March, but newly reelected President Putin is definitely a pain.

His meeting with President Obama yesterday produced little or nothing on the two main issues for the United States:  Syria and the Iranian nuclear program.   Meanwhile, the Brits stopped a shipment of refurbished Russian attack helicopters headed for Syria, while the Iranians thumbed their noses at the U.S.-backed nuclear offer.  It’s a good thing the nuclear talks, which are continuing today, are being held in Moscow, since that gives the Russians an incentive to float new ideas and prevent a collapse.  The Russians will do what they can to pass the hot potato on to the next meeting, reportedly to be held in Beijing.

The problem isn’t so much that Russia is a geopolitical foe with the capacity to do America serious harm, which is what it was during the Cold War.  The problem is that Moscow controls some things Washington needs, like the northern supply route to Afghanistan and the Security Council consensus on blocking Iran’s nuclear program.  The U.S. can manage without these things, but it can manage much better with them.

Presidents Obama and Putin looked none too pleased with each other yesterday at their meeting in Mexico, during a G-20 summit.  Putin, who is trying to re-establish Russia’s great power status, figures sticking it to Obama will help him demonstrate that Russia is indispensible.  Obama has both hands tied behind his back, because–contrary to what one of my Twitter followers suggested yesterday–he needs Putin’s help on Afghanistan and Iran, even if Russia is today a middling power.

This makes for an uncivil relationship, one that could end with tragedy in Syria and catastrophe in Iran.  The Russian bear hasn’t got the capacity to project power that the Soviet one had, but it is leveraging its weakened position effectively.  I share President Obama’s preference for multilateralism, which has virtues in particular for dealing with Iran and Syria.  But it is important to keep open other options, if only to counter a middling power seeking to leverage its assets.

Daniel Serwer

Share
Published by
Daniel Serwer

Recent Posts

Heading for Kyiv, thinking about post-war

This war should end with a prosperous, democratic Ukraine in Europe. If I can contribute…

5 hours ago

Popular protests in Serbia target Vucic

The question is whether the demonstrators can exploit the moment to unseat a wily and…

5 days ago

What US aid will look like after USAID

US aid will be a cash cow for Trump donors, a mainstay of autocratic regimes…

1 week ago

A Passover for the Palestinians

Might makes right can work for a while. But in the end they will need…

2 weeks ago

The damage is vast and continuing

The simple fact is we were better off on January 19 than we are today.…

2 weeks ago

It’s still a long road to change

I was pleased today to spend an hour and a half or so among the…

3 weeks ago