Categories: Uncategorized

Root and branch

Last night’s terrific discussion of Righting the Balance here at SAIS’ Foreign Policy Institute with Tom Pickering and Kristin Lord commenting:

Key issues in the commentary and Q and A:

  1. How can the case for prevention be made more convincingly?
  2. How can we make better use of the nongovernmental sector?
  3. How do we know when enough state-building is enough? How should we decide to terminate missions?
  4. How do we grown the civilian talent needed?
  5. How do we prevent the US from turning inward and avoiding international engagement?
  6. How can the State and AID bureaucracies be reformed without blowing them up?
  7. Why can’t we do better at whole of government efforts?
  8. How can we restore diplomacy to a central role in foreign affairs?

That last question might be getting at least a temporary answer from John Kerry’s hyperactivity.  If he brings home an Iranian nuclear pause and succeeds even modestly on Israel/Palestine and Syria, diplomacy could be in fashion pretty soon.

As you’ll see if you watch, I took a lot of incoming on the issue of root and branch destruction of AID and State.  This I expected, and I don’t really think anyone will try to do what I suggest.  I agree with Kristin Lord’s suggestions at the end about changing the State personnel system to reward teamwork.  That would be a good thing to do.  But my thought experiment is nonetheless valuable:  if we started from scratch, what would we need?

If it is, as I think, nothing like what we’ve got, then we’ve got to think much more broadly about what reform of State and AID really entails.  It is not adding or deleting a bureau here or there, which has been done many times in recent decades.  It is altering the structure and functions of the institution as a whole.

I don’t pretend to have a fully worked out picture of what that would look like, but I find it hard to imagine that it would include the separation between State and AID.  And I think our government-funded nongovernmental efforts need amping up.  I’d be glad to see others elaborate more fully on what it is we really need from our diplomatic and foreign assistance establishment.

Daniel Serwer

Share
Published by
Daniel Serwer

Recent Posts

No free country without free women

Al Sharaa won't be able to decide, but his decisions will influence the outcome. Let's…

1 day ago

Iran’s predicament incentivizes nukes

Transparently assembling all the material and technology needed for nuclear weapons might serve Iran well…

1 day ago

Getting to Syria’s next regime

The fall of the Assad regime in Syria was swift. Now comes the hard part:…

4 days ago

Grenell’s special missions

Good luck and timing are important factors in diplomacy. It's possible Grenell will not fail…

1 week ago

What the US should do in Syria

There are big opportunities in Syria to make a better life for Syrians. Not to…

1 week ago

More remains to be done, but credit is due

HTS-led forces have done a remarkable job in a short time. The risks of fragmentation…

2 weeks ago