Crackdown, but not too far
Milan Marinković writes from Niš:
Serb extremist attacks on three polling stations in the northern part of Kosovo during the recent first round of local elections, along with an already steady increase in drug-related violence and crime in Serbia, have made Serbian prime minister Ivica Dačić and his deputy Aleksandar Vučić announce a “historically unprecedented” crackdown. Their focus is on football hooliganism and far right political extremism – both of which have close ties with illegal activity in northern Kosovo, as well as with each other. According to recent media revelations, a growing number of Serbian football hooligans and ultranationalists are joining the influential international neo-Nazi organization “Combat 18,” originally founded in the UK.
Rhetorical determination notwithstanding, the government is highly unlikely to launch a full-scale war against the country’s most powerful criminal organizations due to the palpable security risks, compounded by organized crime’s penetration of vital state institutions. Police departments – and in some cases even parts of police departments – have been fighting among themselves. There has also been a series of incidents and crimes committed in a relatively short time period by members of the elite police unit, Gendarmerie. The Gendarmerie is of particular concern because it is beyond doubt the strongest armed force within the entire security sector in terms of training, equipment and overall combat capability.
The presence of criminal elements in the Gendarmerie is a direct consequence of how the unit was formed. Much of its personnel came from the former Unit for Special Operations (JSO), which was created in the 1990s by then-president Slobodan Milošević’s secret police (RDB) for war purposes. A majority of JSO members were initially recruited among experienced criminals, many motivated to join by the promise of release from prison and other privileges. After the 1990s Balkans wars had ended, JSO continued to serve as a powerful instrument of oppression, intimidation and sometimes even execution of the regime’s opponents. The notorious unit was dismantled only after the discovery that its top officers played a key role in the assassination of pro-Western reformist prime minister Zoran Đinđić in 2003.
Many JSO operatives were incorporated into the subsequently formed Gendarmerie. The rationale was that it would have been extremely risky to leave such dangerous individuals with ample criminal backgrounds to their own devices. As much as the decision seemed logical at the time, it has consequences still today.
One of the most controversial questions today pertains to the relationship between problematic Gendarmerie members and football hooligan groups, some of which represent the most dangerous, violent and aggressive criminal organizations in Serbia. A few years ago several gendarmes tasked with guarding the stadium of the Belgrade football club “Red Star” deliberately allowed hooligans affiliated with the club to enter the facility, whereupon they stormed into the office of the club’s then-president Dobrivoje Tanasijević and threatened him with force in an attempt to extort his resignation.
The much-anticipated crackdown will face difficulty confronting the larger and better organized football hooligan groups, which resemble Mexican drug cartels. Without elimination – or at least drastic weakening – of these potent criminal organizations, privatization of major football clubs – which the state cannot afford to subsidize indefinitely – will almost certainly fail. Though nominally just “fans,” most influential hooligan groups are de facto unofficial co-owners and will therefore do everything they can to prevent their clubs from being sold to potential legal owners in a proper and transparent way.
Besides the customary drug trade as a source of funding, some football hooligan capos gain huge profits from clandestine financial transactions related to transfers of prominent football players from one club to another, virtually treating footballers as their own property. This kind of human trafficking is ascribed to a branch of organized crime in Serbia commonly referred to as “football mafia,” which also involves stakeholders from otherwise legal professions, including politics. In addition to a desire for better wages and other conditions, the main reason most Serbian football stars strive to be sold abroad as soon as possible is to escape from the criminals that blackmail them. Physical and verbal attacks by hooligans on football players, as well as damage to their cars, have become common means of intimidation.
The urgent need to suppress football hooliganism and other growing security threats comes at an inconvenient time for the Serbian government. It already has to take on numerous pressing issues that were were routinely swept under the carpet by previous administrations but can no longer be ignored, such as painful structural reforms to the economy, a comprehensive institutional overhaul and reining in pervasive corruption.
The prospective crackdown will be temporary and limited in scope. Some arrests will be made in coming weeks, perhaps in a spectacular manner, to demonstrate that something is being done. But at the same time the authorities will press covert efforts to reach some sort of informal “peace agreement” with senior leaders of major hooligan gangs, reducing violence by their subordinate operatives to tolerable levels. It is not clear, however, to what extent these leaders are able to control younger members of their respective gangs, since these are brutal and unscrupulous in pursuit of more advanced positions within the criminal hierarchy.
2 thoughts on “Crackdown, but not too far”
Comments are closed.
For all the stories about the “football fans” that appear in the Belgrade papers, there’s a remarkable dearth of information available to the outsider, since for obvious reasons no more than the barest reports of their activities make it into print. (B92‘s building has been attacked more than once.) And foreign reporters who might provide some context are a luxury that American news outlets can no longer afford. Mr. Marinkovic’s account is unfortunately even more disturbing than what I at least had supposed was going on. In particular, I had not realized that the criminals released from jail during the wars to serve with the paramilitary forces were still embedded in the country’s law forces.
Did any of the former Communist countries come up with a good solution with what to do with their bloated police and security forces after the regime change? Firing their members meant leaving to their own devices men with weapons and knowledge of the local criminal world, not to mention those with an understanding of the international drug trade, unemployed and with a grudge against the new system. In Czechoslovakia at least, they compounded the problem by leaving the old criminal laws and judges in place, making it difficult to control them via the courts, high-mindedly promising that no one would be prosecuted for what had not been a crime at the time it was committed.
Kosovo is now being asked to incorporate into its own police force members of the Serbian police who had been serving, despite Belgrade’s denials, in the country since Serbia’s supposed withdrawal of its police forces after the war. Belgrade wants the men to be accepted as a unit, without any need for applications and background checks or pledges of allegiance to their new employer. Based on the present article, this seems like an even worse idea than it does on the face of it.
These former or present Serbian police are apparently the backbone of the “Civil Defense” group supposedly formed to provide protection for the Serbs of northern Kosovo in times of “natural disasters,” which they claim means they’re entitled to carry weapons (and serve as bodyguards for visiting Serbian politicians). The group showed up during the re-run elections, standing around watching the people coming out to vote. After being chased off once early in the day, they reappeared – and were dispersed again – about a half-hour before the polls closed. About the same time, the OSCE representatives decided that the ballot boxes would be packed up and sent to the Central Election Commission offices in the south for counting. The original plan had been for the ballots to first be counted on-site, and the Serbian-government-approved candidate for mayor is taking advantage of the change in procedure to claim that the “internationals and Prishtina” employed the time when they had control of the ballot boxes during transportation to finagle the outcome. The “internationals” so far have not provided any explanation for their decision, apparently thinking it more important to protect Serbia’s reputation (and chance for progress toward EU membership) than their own. One can only hope that clear and unambiguous messages are being sent behind the scenes. Maybe going after the football clubs will be enough to satisfy the easily satisfied EU?
While I was writing the above, B92 published the denial by the OSCE Head of Mission in Kosovo, Ambassador Jean-Claude Schlumberger, that OSCE unilaterally decided to move the ballot boxes – the decision was made by the Kosovo Central Election Commission. Of course. But yesterday one of the Prishtina papers mentioned in passing that the decision had been made by the Commission on the basis of information provided by OSCE intelligence.