Better than nothing
Welcome though it must be, it is difficult to applaud today’s guilty verdicts at the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslovia (ICTY) for Radovan Karadzic, the wartime president of Republika Srpska. Coming more than 20 years after the end of the Bosnian war, this is certainly justice delayed. Karadzic, who hid for 15 years and has been on trial for five, will now appeal and eventually serve out the rest of his life in relative luxury in a first-class European prison. Few of his victims or their surviving families will feel much “closure” from this outcome. His supporters will see the ICTY verdict as selective and prejudiced against Serbs.
Worse, people who support his political program of independence for Republika Srpska are very much in charge there. I can’t get too excited about the naming of a university dormitory in his honor. What bothers me far more is RS President Dodik’s repeated advocacy of independence for an entity that was founded on ethnic cleansing, murder, rape and genocide committed against Bosniaks and Croats that Karadizic commanded from 1992 to 1995. Since then, only the current Syrian war has done as much damage proportionally as the deaths and displacement inflicted on Bosnia during those years.
Dodik is an elected official and no doubt represents the views of a majority of his Serb constituency. It might even be argued that naming a university dormitory for Karadzic is damning with only the requisite faint praise. But Karadzic was convicted of one count of genocide (acquitted on another), five of crimes against humanity and four violations of the rules and customs of war, including murder, terror, unlawful attacks against civilians and taking of hostages. How easy should the students sleep in such a dormitory?
This is not the same as an American university named after slaveholders George Washington or Thomas Jefferson. America today doesn’t celebrate them for holding slaves but rather for other contributions to a society still trying to come to terms with what we recognize as the crimes against humanity they and their contemporaries committed. Washington was our revolutionary military commander and Jefferson the author of the declaration of independence that declared all men created equal, quite the contrary of his personal behavior.
Karadzic and Dodik have demonstrated much more consistency than our founders. They have not deviated from claiming that Republika Srpska belongs to the Serbs who rightfully wrested most of the towns and much of the rural area from Muslims, Croats and others who had lived there for centuries. For them all people are not created equal and military success is its own justification. Those ideas are inconsistent with today’s standards, as enunciated in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the now voluminous laws of war. Dodik’s modest virtue is that he merely espouses odious ideas. Karadzic’s crime was that he acted on them.
The conviction puts Belgrade in an awkward spot. I expect lots of nationalist Serbs there to praise and defend Karadzic and denounce the tribunal. But I certainly hope the Serbian government understands that its aspirations to EU membership are inconsistent with even modest official complaints. The Serbian parliamentary election campaign may tempt some to don the nationalist mantle. But for anyone wanting to maintain good relations with Washington and Brussels doing so would be a big mistake. It is bad enough that Karadzic for years managed to hide in Serbia. Compounding that felony would be a bigger mistake.
I understand those who will say that justice delayed is justice denied. But in this case justice delayed is better than the only realistic alternative: no justice at all. It would have been worse had Karadzic managed to remain at large, in Serbia or elsewhere, or if he had–like Slobodan Milosevic–died in prison. I’m not celebrating: these verdicts come far too late. But I’m not disappointed either: Karadzic led a criminal enterprise whose basic ideas Dodik still espouses. For the sake of Bosnia and Herzegovina as well as the Balkans region, better to have a clear decision of the Tribunal than not to have anything at all.
PS: For those who have the stamina, 1.75 hours of verdicts:
2 thoughts on “Better than nothing”
Comments are closed.
Well said. I couldn’t agree more. One string of developments to watch for:
Seselj’s verdict is due March 31st and his party (SPS) is polling at 6%. The SNS is in the high 40’s and the next best party is currently polling at around 11%.
Today’s Karadzic verdict including an aside that Karadzic operated in a joint criminal enterprise with Seselj (and Mladic and others). This makes it pretty likely that Seselj will be convicted. It will take some legal gymnastics to give him less than an 11 year sentence (which would equal his time served). The current government would then be in an even tighter spot to extradite him, something that they have thus far been holding up.
The effect of all of this is that the SPS will have today’s verdict and Seselj’s verdict to rally around and creep towards a small chunk of the parliament. If that is true, how much more powerful will the nationalist elements within the SNS be?
All of these developments will unfortunately make it harder for Serbia’s many unresolved domestic war crimes implicating Serbian defendants to be indicted and resolved without significant EU pressure. The EU, on the other hand, seems very eager to open the related accession chapter (23) this year. Opening a chapter isn’t the same as closing it. But doing so without requiring more from Serbia’s political leaders (and justice-sector officials) would be a huge opportunity lost.
oh of course Serwer the demented Serbophobe claims that RS was created on cleansing but fails to mention that there were 150,000 Serbs living in Sarajevo before the war. Today that number is less than 5,000. Of course it can’t be ethnic cleansing and genocide if the Serbs are victims.
But wishful thinking on the part of Serwer to think that Serbia’s relations with Washington and Brussels would actually be effected by stating the obvious that the Hague Tribunal operates on selective justice.
In fact the Serbian Government has already said that in a press conference. And absolutely nothing will happen. Why? Because bigots like Serwer are nobody when it comes to decision making. God can judge Karadzic because the Hague is not a proper tribunal. But Republika Srpska will not cede an inch of its autonomy or drive for self-determination. And no one will stop it because thank God Serwer is a nobody. Sorry it can’t be 1995 forever.