Anyone but Jeremic
I am getting a lot of questions about Vuk Jeremic’s candidacy for UN Secretary General, which the Serbian government is supporting. Here is what I have to say:
I think Vuk Jeremic is ill-regarded in Washington, both from his time as Foreign Minister and his time as President of the General Assembly. His support lies in Moscow, not the US. I am frankly surprised that a government aiming at EU membership would put him forward.
Jeremic’s most important contribution to peace in the Balkans was his mistake in asking the International Court of Justice for an advisory opinion on Kosovo’s declaration of independence. The ICJ concluded unequivocally that the declaration breached no international law. That defeat of Belgrade’s claim led to the dialogue with Pristina and the ongoing process of reintegration of the north with the rest of Kosovo, whose constitutional legitimacy on its whole territory Belgrade has accepted.
I suppose Belgrade, where he is not in particularly good odor with the current government, puts him forward partly to assuage the Russians and partly to get him off their backs. Neither of those is a good reason for Washington to support him.
People will tell you Jeremic is hardworking and knows the UN well. Both are true. And for the US they are two additional reasons not to want him as Secretary General. He would work hard and possibly have significant success in making America’s goals unachievable, not only in the Balkans but elsewhere as well. He didn’t keep commitments to the US while he was foreign minister. He certainly wouldn’t do so as UN Secretary General.
From the American perspective, there are lots of good candidates this time around. Any one of them would be better than Jeremic.
Share this, I'll really appreciate it:
4 thoughts on “Anyone but Jeremic”
Comments are closed.
RSS - Posts
Serwer the piece of shit never relents
Good comment. There are two additional facts worthwhile to mention: South Africa actually suggested Jeremic for the UN Secretary General post and then Serbia under obvious pressure by their Russian colleagues. Unfortunately, Jeremic enjoys wide support among Serbian electorate although that will likely change if Serbia progress in its way towards the EU.
Daniel Serwer writes: He would work hard and possibly have significant success in making America’s goals unachievable, not only in the Balkans but elsewhere as well.
I don’t understand why it would be negative that the US would not achieve their goals in the Balkans. Would you please elaborate why the US foreign political goals is good for the Balkans? I am a former NATO officer in Kosovo, and when I see how the US has destabilized Serbia with Albanian guerrillas, without any apologies to Serbia for their behavior, I do not see how the US has been promoting peace in the Balkans.
Dear prof. Serwer,
I’m frankly disappointed by your approach when discussing the issue of Mr. Jeremic candidacy for UN Secretary General. Mr. Jeremic is candidate for the UN Secretary General and not candidate for US Secretary of State. It means he should be committed to UN goals and not the goals of US foreign policy. Unless, you perceive UN as another tool for achieving US goals. If this is the case, it is so shameful for an intellectual as you are and, in the same time, regressive for international relations. I’m not nationalist, populist or far-right extremist from the Balkans. Quite contrary! I’m not fan of Mr. Jeremic, but neither supporter of ideas of world order in which one state perceive itself as a center of the world.
Kind regards,