Evenhanded would be wrongheaded
Yesterday, I said Kosovo’s 100% tariff imposed on Serbian imports was a violation of its international obligations under the Central European Free Trade Agreement (CEFTA).
Today, my email brought me this from the Kosovo Government. I still think these issues should be mainly resolved within the CEFTA framework, but certainly the government paper casts doubt on the bona fides of Serbia as well as Bosnia and Herzegovina (where policy is essentially dictated by Republika Srpska). I’m sure there are trade complaints as well in the other direction. They all need to be resolved, as much as possible within CEFTA.
The Kosovo Customs Agency is ensuring that it is exempting humanitarian goods from the tariffs.
Some of my Serb friends are suggesting that the only reason for a Kosovo army is to chase Serbs imminently from the country. That’s silly. NATO is there and will remain for some years still, until Kosovo can defend itself at least for a few days from whatever threat Serbia presents. The less the threat, the smaller the army. No army is needed to chase people from their homes, as the tragic rioting of March 2004 demonstrated.
It is far more likely that the Serb Army would seize northern Kosovo, on grounds that its population is threatened, a notion Belgrade has been pumping up relentlessly for weeks if not months. NATO might even fall for such a ploy, given its weak-kneed and gullible reaction to the Serbian Prime Minister’s threat of the use of force if Kosovo votes to create an army.
There is right and wrong here. Serbia is wrong to harass Kosovo’s exports, to prevent it from joining international organizations, to seek to block it from creating an army, and to threaten the use of force. Evenhanded at the moment would be wrongheaded.
Share this, I'll really appreciate it:
2 thoughts on “Evenhanded would be wrongheaded”
Comments are closed.
RSS - Posts
Serbia is using everything in its power to so provoke Kosovo that it either gives up its claim to independence and comes crawling back to Serbian control, or it lashes out and does something that will justify Serbia in attacking it militarily and taking it back by force. Dream on, Serbia. The Albanians have outlasted Romans, Slav and Turk occupiers over the centuries, and Serbia’s silly attempts to nag them back into “more than autonomy, less than independence” seem even less likely to succeed than previous states’ attempts to subjugate them. This time, for the first time since the Romans arrived, the Albanians have allies. Distracted allies at present, it seems.
(Serbia arrived for its CEFTA meeting in Pristina (Dec 6) and graciously allowed Kosovo officials to be present initially, even though UNMIK is its “sole official representative” (per B92 – I haven’t checked the wording). The Serbs opened by demanding the immediate withdrawal of the 100 percent tariff, the Kosovars walked out, soon to be followed by the Albanians, and the meeting was ended for lack of a quorum. The Serbians left immediately with Kfor protection “because of the danger.”)
And everyone knows NATO did a great job in 2004 protecting serbs