Paying later will cost even more

I spent last week in Kosovo, where the presidency hosted Bill Clinton and Madeleine Albright for a celebration of the country’s liberation by NATO forces 20 years ago. For the 90% of the population that is Albanian, half of whom were expelled in 1998 and 1999, the NATO deployment was a source of great joy, enabling them to return en masse. For Serbs and Roma, the moment was terrifying, as some returning Albanians sought revenge on them for Serbian President Milosevic’s depredations.

The main event last week consisted of speeches in the main square, followed by lunch in the fine Swiss Diamond Hotel and a stroll down Mother Teresa Street to dedicate a bust of former Secretary of State Albright, followed by a motorcade to a statue of former President Clinton. I skipped the Clinton statue, as it was beastly hot and sunny, and I needed to prepare for the evening’s conference on Balkans security 20 years after the NATO/Serbia war.

The Kosovars were out in force for the stroll, anxious to show their affections for the United States. American flags were at least as apparent as Kosovo flags, and chants of “USA” broke out with enthusiasm. President Clinton enjoys pressing the flesh and did it with a big smile on his face. Kosovo President Thaci got far less attention and a few boos. Secretary Albright was in good spirits I knew from a chat we had getting off the plane from Munich, but to tell the truth I rarely caught a glimpse of her short stature during the celebration due to the surrounding crowd.

The mood in Pristina these days is anxious. Talks with Belgrade have been going nowhere. European Union member countries, especially France, have been trying to slow progress towards any further enlargement in the Balkans. Montenegro is too small and too far advanced in accession negotiations to stop, I think, but the consensus needed to open accession talks with Macedonia is not solid. Albania is likely blocked for now. Europe’s hesitation darkens the mood throughout the Balkans and perhaps especially in Kosovo, where NATO and EU membership are the country’s strategic goals.

Reaching them is far off. Kosovo legislation must be compatible with EU requirements, but implementation often lags and EU responsiveness is declining. Even after fulfilling elaborate requirements, Kosovo has not been given the EU visa waiver it was promised. President Thaci and Prime Minister Haradinaj, both products of the wartime Kosovo Liberation Army, are at odds, mainly over how to approach “normalization” with Belgrade. Thaci had indicated he was ready to exchange some Serb-populated territory for Albanian-populated territory in Serbia, but that deal has evaporated under examination by critics (including me). Haradinaj opposed Thaci’s unconsummated deal and has imposed tariffs on Serbian goods imported into Kosovo, stalling the talks with Belgrade. Meanwhile, governance in Kosovo is lamentably corrupt and young people are leaving (as they are from most other countries in the Balkans).

So the celebration of NATO liberation was happy, but Kosovo is not. I was stopped in the street one night by three strangers, two brothers and a cousin, and asked to chat with them in a cafe. They lamented the current situation and tried to convince me that all Kosovo’s ills would be solved by union with Albania. They were uninterested in my questioning whether they would be happy to be governed from Tirana, whose politics are even more contentious than Pristina’s. Nor did they want to discuss my suggestion that neither Kosovo’s politicians nor Albania’s were likely to agree to move their capital. They were content with the notion that Serbs would need to move out of Kosovo if Greater Albania comes into existence.

I am not. There is no reason why, if governed fairly, Serbs and Albanians can’t both enjoy a future in Kosovo. But the current international mood–ethnic nationalism and xenophobia–piled on top of Kosovo’s history of the same is making a liberal democratic outcome there and in the rest of the Balkans less likely than at any time during the past 25 years. Europe and America need to find a way of renewing their promises or face the loss of the statebuilding projects in Kosovo as well as in Bosnia and Herzegovina on which they have spent a good deal of time, money, and effort. Their collapse will certainly cost a great deal more.

Tags : , , , ,

5 thoughts on “Paying later will cost even more”

  1. Serwer is encouraging the former Yugoslavian extremists to violate the Prespa Agreement by calling the country “Macedonia”rather than NORTH Macedonia.

    The anti-Greek bigot also encourages them to violate Prespa by looking the other way as his ultra nationalist pals at “UNITED Macedonia” Diaspora continue to try to narrate themselves into ancient Macedonians (apparently ancient Macedonians were antihellenic Slavs based out of ancient Paeonia)

    And this is why Greeks should ignore the Prespa Agreement as well. SDSM are moderates but half the Skopians have no intention of honoring the agreement. And why should they when masses of antihellenic trolls like Daniel encourage the crypto-ascists in UMD to violate the agreement by calling them “Macedonia”, look the other way as they try to narrate themselves into “ancient Macedonians” and promote irredentism

    Daniel Serwer claims to support “human rights” and speak for history — but then lies and evades in the present. An intellectual fraud and an antihellenic bigot rolled into one.

    1. Article 7 para 5 of the Prespa agreement reads “Nothing in this Agreement is intended to denigrate in any way,or to alter or affect, the usage by the citizens of either Party.” Much less citizens of a third party. First lesson of agreements: read before citing.

      1. Yawn. Article 8.

        “If either Party believes one or more symbols constituting part of its historic or cultural patrimony is being used by the other Party, it shall bring such alleged use to the attention of the other Party, and the other Party shall take appropriate corrective action to effectively address the issue and ensure respect for the said patrimony.”

  2. You claim to speak for “Freedom” but on your own blog you effectively practice propaganda by constantly deleting posts by Greeks outlining your moral and intellectual inconsistencies.

    I know this first hand as I have been posting here for years and watched virtually all my posts disappear. You let that last one through purely because you claim to have a legitimate answer to why you’ve aligned yourself with Skopian extremists that violate the Prespa Agreement by calling them “Macedonia” rather than NORTH Macedonia.. Perhaps delete the rest of my posts to give yourself the last word to make it appear there were no rebuttals eh Serwer?

    I will continue to post here even though I know you lack the integrity to let the posts stand. Every post you delete in rebuttal is only evidence you have no moral credibility on this Macedonia issue.

    You and the entire universe can argue the ambiguities of Greek heritage from here to eternity if you like. What you can’t do is change the Greek on ancient Macedonian artifacts attesting to their self-determination as Hellenes.

    By contrast there is academic consensus that Slavs in Skopje have not been calling themselves “Macedonians” since antiquity as the shameless liars at UNITED MACEDONIA Diaspora insinuate. Most of them are descendent’s of people that freely self-identified as Bulgarians prior to the 20th century.

    Yet curiously you have put on your intellectual beer goggles and pretend you don’t notice “UNITED MACEDONIA” Disspora’s changed ethnic narrative into “ancient Macedonians” and endless insinuations that Macedonia Greece belongs to them.

    Then you expect Greeks to take your lectures on ethics and history seriously?

Comments are closed.

Tweet