Serious questions

There is nothing magical about 100,000 dead. It is just like the number 101,239, which no doubt America has now also crossed. Whichever number is attached to your death, your relatives will mourn, your friends will grieve, your colleagues and acquaintances will miss your presence. But for those of us more removed, our minds anchor on round numbers as milestones. They give us pause. They provide an opportunity to reflect. And they make us wonder where we are headed.

Not, however, if you are Donald Trump. He instead tried to distract attention with false allegations about a TV news anchor and false claims about fraud associated with voting by mail. Forty per cent of Americans like this mendacious approach to governance–they remain loyal no matter what. They know that black and brown people are dying from Covid-19 more often than white ones. They know cities have been harder hit than rural areas. They figure voting by mail will help Democrats more than Republicans.

Their comfort will be short-lived. Covid-19 is headed into rural areas and Red states. White people, especially older Trump-supporting males, will soon be dying in more proportional numbers. The economy may show positive numbers in coming months, but we are in a deep trough and odds are strong we’ll be nowhere near the early 2020 peak before election day November 3. President Trump will end his first term with a year of recession behind him.

My friends are concerned that Joe Biden is not doing enough to defeat Trump. I beg to differ. It seems to me that letting Trump hang himself has been an effective part of Biden’s strategy. I don’t really care what the polls say this far out, but when a President is underwater in approval about five months before Election Day, he is in trouble. Most presidents in the past would have reached out to moderates, independents, and potential cross-overs. Not Donald Trump: he is instead trying to corner the mostly white, mostly male, racist vote. He retweets “the only good Democrat is a dead Democrat” and then tweets “When the looting starts, the shooting starts.” Even for Twitter, this was too much and they labelled it as glorifying violence.

Let me be clear: I don’t like the violence in Minneapolis and its political impact could be disastrous. Law and order candidate Richard Nixon in 1968 benefited greatly from disorder. The threat of violence may be an important political factor in favor of those who wield it. But the fact of violence limits popular support and turns off a lot of people. Nonviolent discipline is a vital ingredient in popular uprisings.

Trump has gotten away with incitement to violence his entire life. He is not going to change now. He is going to run a divisive campaign while Biden tries to run a dignified and welcoming one. The only real question is which the Americans prefer. There is no real doubt about the numerical majority: the popular vote will go for Biden, by millions. But American elections are decided in the Electoral College, which gives mostly white rural America grossly disproportionate weight. Two out of the last three Republican presidents were elected without a majority of the popular vote. One more of those would raise serious questions about the sustainability of American democracy.

2 thoughts on “Serious questions”

  1. Thanks for posting. Comrade T’s lack of leadership related to US response to the pandemic – 100,000+ deaths now, will it be become 200,000 in the fall?

    Another killing of an unarmed black man has touched off protests in already difficult times.

    Martin Luther King is one of my heroes. My thoughts turned to that day on the Tidal Basin when the Mall was filled with people with the courage to work to make change happen in the US

    I pondered how Americans must come together now to address the serious questions that have to be resolved in the lead-up to our 2020 presidential elections – https://www.history.com/topics/civil-rights-movement/i-have-a-dream-speech

  2. Easy to agree here . . . Except, perhaps, the last sentence.

    The Electoral College, like it or not, is a key component of American democracy. Should Trump get re-elected with less than a majority of the popular vote, it speaks most to whether or not Constitutional change is required — not whether or not our democracy will survive. In fact, our democracy would survive quite well if there were a movement to amend the Constitution as regards the Electoral College, especially if it were successful.

    Perhaps such a movement exists, though I see very little about it.

Comments are closed.

Tweet