Doubts about America’s November 3 election are multiplying: These are the most prominent concerns:
Voter suppression is definitely an issue. It has become integral to Republican campaign strategy. The phenomenon is not new. The Democrats used to do it, when their white supremacists controlled the South. Now it is vital to Republican prospects.
A glance at The Economist‘s forecasts is enough to illustrate the point. Trump is down to a 7% chance of winning the Electoral College, where he is far stronger than in the popular vote because the Electoral College favors smaller, more rural states. But Vice President Biden is now favored to win even Florida, North Carolina, and Arizona, all states Trump won last time around. Trump in current polling is looking strong in only a dozen states, all part of his base. A successful voter suppression campaign would render all these polls meaningless.
Voter suppression takes many forms: limiting polling places in Democratic strongholds, making mail-in voting more difficult, poll-watchers and election workers who intimidate, raising the cost of voting to those who have served jail time by making them pay court costs or fines, sending out misleading election information, and gerrymandering Congressional districts (though that has minimal effect on a presidential election). These are real and concerted efforts now in the Republican playbook. The Republican-controlled Supreme Court, in a series of rulings, has followed suit by choosing to limit voting rights.
2 and 3, never before big worries in my lifetime, are now emerging as concerns for some people. Neither is feasible, so long as constitutional procedures are observed.
President Trump cannot postpone the election–it is Congress that has that power, which has not been delegated to the President. The divided Congress is not going to change that. In any event, Trump leaves office, according to the Constitution, on January 20, so a postponement would not gain him much time.
Nor is 3 feasible, even though Trump is refusing to commit to accepting the election results. But once the states convey their Electoral College results to a joint session of Congress on December 14, whoever has the majority wins. If no one gets a majority, the House of Representatives chooses the President, in a “contingent” election based on a single vote for each state. It is the newly elected House, not the existing one, that gets to decide, but the new one is sure to be more Democratic than the current one.
There is of course the possibility of an extra-constitutional outcome: a coup. This cannot be ruled out. I find it hard to believe that the real purpose in deploying Federal law enforcement cadres to Portland, Oregon in the past week or so, over the objections of the governor, mayor, and many other officials, is to prevent graffiti on Federal property. The Administration is testing the limits: what can they get away with? This is classic Trump, who always pushes back on constraints to his behavior. He may be looking for excuses to deploy more forces before the election, generating enough violence to suppress voting, or he may be preparing for a post-election coup.
This sounds unlikely to me. We are a young country, but an old governing system. Elections have been held even when the country was at war, constitutional procedures have been followed, and presidents have gained and lost power in orderly fashion since 1789. President Trump no doubt dreads leaving office, but he can protect himself from prosecution by pardoning himself. I have no doubt that he will do it, as he has for his lying friends, war criminals, and other miscreants.
In any event, a coup won’t be necessary if Trump wins. So fans, the election will be held November 3 and Trump won’t have any choice constitutional choice but to accept the election results. But he will try to suppress the vote. Vote him away! is the right response.
Al Sharaa won't be able to decide, but his decisions will influence the outcome. Let's…
Transparently assembling all the material and technology needed for nuclear weapons might serve Iran well…
The fall of the Assad regime in Syria was swift. Now comes the hard part:…
Good luck and timing are important factors in diplomacy. It's possible Grenell will not fail…
There are big opportunities in Syria to make a better life for Syrians. Not to…
HTS-led forces have done a remarkable job in a short time. The risks of fragmentation…