Month: August 2020
Stevenson’s army, August 22
– NYT suggests Trump will follow 1988 playbook.
– FP’s James Taub infers a Biden foreign policy doctrine.
– CIA DIrector Haspel will go.
– SAIS Prof Todd Harrison coauthors CSIS report on defense budget.
-Anti-Trump Duke prof explains why he didn’t sign latest letter.
My SAIS colleague Charlie Stevenson distributes this almost daily news digest of foreign/defense/national security policy to “Stevenson’s army” via Googlegroups. I plan to republish here. To get Stevenson’s army by email, send a blank email (no subject or text in the body) to stevensons-army+subscribe@googlegroups.com. You’ll get an email confirming your join request. Click “Join This Group” and follow the instructions to join. Once you have joined, you can adjust your email delivery preferences (if you want every email or a digest of the emails).
Stevenson’s army, August 21
– 73 officials who served in Republican administrations, including Dean Cohen and Prof Edelman [who were Never Trumpers in 2016], have signed a letter endorsing Joe Biden for president.
– Bipartisan Scowcroft Center report says DHS should refocus its mission.
– Politico says OMB political appointees have been given more power to apportion funds, a job previously done by careerists. WaPo confirms.
DOD moves to classified telework.
– Iraq developments: militia riots in Basra; US companies get contracts; PM meets with POTUS.
My SAIS colleague Charlie Stevenson distributes this almost daily news digest of foreign/defense/national security policy to “Stevenson’s army” via Googlegroups. I plan to republish here. To get Stevenson’s army by email, send a blank email (no subject or text in the body) to stevensons-army+subscribe@googlegroups.com. You’ll get an email confirming your join request. Click “Join This Group” and follow the instructions to join. Once you have joined, you can adjust your email delivery preferences (if you want every email or a digest of the emails).
Why so reluctant Aleksandar, why?
Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic is turning increasingly East, disappointing those who thought he might be the Serbian nationalist with sufficient credibility on that side of the political spectrum to make a definitive move toward the West. Why is he doing the opposite?
There are several explanations, not mutually exclusive. As in many things politicians do, there are more reasons than needed:
- The West is not proving very attractive. The Americans have little or nothing substantial to offer, beyond loan political risks insurance and support for World Bank loans. The European Union provides lots of money but is more than hesitant about enlargement. In any event, both offer whatever they’ve got with strings attached, then ignore the conditions they themselves impose. Wouldn’t you take the money and run?
- What the West asks is hard. Both Brussels and Washington are pressing for serious normalization of relations with Pristina, which would mean Vucic has to take responsibility for recognizing and establishing diplomatic relations. He has been unwilling to bite that bullet and prefers to control Serbs and resources in Kosovo, hoping thereby to make its independence moot.
- There isn’t much domestic political weight in the Western direction. The liberal democratic opposition in Serbia is even weaker and more divided than usual. Nationalism occupies most of the political space. Vucic’s primary concern is to consolidate power, so moving East is consonant.
- The Russians play dirty. Serbia’s secret services taped a Russian agent paying off one of Serbia’s finest, but Putin and Vucic buried the hatchet (that’s American for decided to make peace and forget about it). The suspicion is that Moscow has threatened, implicitly if not explicitly, to assassinate Vucic, who is more chameleon than superhero.
- China has lots of money. Beijing is spending more of it in Serbia than in other parts of the Balkans, something that Vucic certainly appreciates. Nor does he mind being the “hub” of Beijing’s strategy.
- Russian and Chinese arms are cheap. Serbia has no serious external threat other than Croatia, which is a NATO member and therefore constrained to avoid a kinetic conflict that would complicate the Alliance’s commitments. Belgrade doesn’t need advanced aircraft and air defenses, so it can shop in the bargain basement, which it what it has been doing. Vucic shrugs off American objections.
Vucic is a bit like Turkish President Erdogan: constrained by nationalists within his own body politic to do what comes naturally: accumulate power, obliterate the opposition, and align with other autocrats. Both also enjoy projecting power beyond their borders, on grounds of protecting national security or co-ethnics in neighboring countries. Neo-Ottomanism and Greater Serbia ambitions are external manifestations of domestic nationalist ideology.
In the meanwhile, Vucic gets the Europeans to pay a lot of his bills and the Americans to pressure Pristina into deals on resources like Gazivoda (a lake in northern Kosovo that supplies much of Kosovo’s water supply) and Trepca (a mining complex mostly in northern Kosovo that has been moribund for decades). Russia does relatively little by comparison, but that doesn’t matter because it satisfies nationalist pressure for Slavic cultural and religious affinity and continues to block Kosovo entry into the UN with its certain veto in the Security Council. Putin is smart about keeping the costs of his power projection low.
So there are lots of good reasons for Vucic to do what he is doing, and few compelling ones for a different attitude. He is both feeder and victim of the nationalist milieu that keeps him from anything too bold in the other direction. A real commitment to liberal democracy and EU membership, heartily to be desired, would put his own hold on power at risk, even if it would benefit most of the country’s citizens and accelerate EU accession. Why not just sit tight and get what you can from squeezing the Americans, the Europeans, the Chinese and the Russians? Hedge, don’t bandwagon.
After all, Tito did it, why not Aleksandar.
Stevenson’s army, August 20
The centenary of the 19th amendment is a good moment to reflect on the struggle for women’s suffrage. GZero has a great graphic. I liked to brag that my home state of Colorado gave women the right to vote in 1893, long before the 19th amendment and second only to Wyoming. But a few years ago I did some research and learned that the main reason the law was changed was to dilute the voting power of single miners. Right thing for the wrong reason.
The Air Force is even going to redesign its aircraft to allow more female pilots.
NYT doubts that a President Biden would be able to build bipartisan coalitions in Congress. I certainly favor bipartisanship in foreign policy and the “regular order” [like the NDAA] for major legislation. But maybe the hyperpartisanship is too strong. We can talk about this in class.
NYT says an intelligence community assessment in June disagreed with an earlier DHS intelligence report and concluded that low level officials in Wuhan withheld key coronavirus information from Beijing.
Politico says SecState Pompeo illegally sought military housing, though the army eventually provided lodging at Fort Myer.
NYT has more on F35 sale to UAE, including Netanyahu’s non-denial denial of the sales’ connection to the recognition deal.
I agree with Alice Hunt Friend’s article questioning the need for the SecDef to have military experience.
My SAIS colleague Charlie Stevenson distributes this almost daily news digest of foreign/defense/national security policy to “Stevenson’s army” via Googlegroups. I plan to republish here. To get Stevenson’s army by email, send a blank email (no subject or text in the body) to stevensons-army+subscribe@googlegroups.com. You’ll get an email confirming your join request. Click “Join This Group” and follow the instructions to join. Once you have joined, you can adjust your email delivery preferences (if you want every email or a digest of the emails).
What is Grenell trying to do?
I did an interview for Artiana Matoshi of Radio Television Kosova (RTK) Monday:
Q: How do you see the White House’s invitation for the dialogue on September 2? Why was Ambassador Grenell activated during this period?
A: Everything Donald Trump and his minions do until November 3 is about improving his prospects for re-election. He is trailing Joe Biden dramatically and needs international “accomplishments.” He got one last week with the UAE/Israel deal. That was no more than an announcement of intent to negotiate agreements. I suspect they are aiming for something similar between Kosovo and Serbia.
Q: Do you believe that economics, as proclaimed, will be mentioned or will other topics be unfolded or opened?
A: They will try for anything they can get. Trump and Grenell are desperate.
Q: What do you expect from this meeting in general and do you think it will be effective?
A: I expect Kosovo to be pressured mercilessly to accept infringements on its sovereignty, including both territorial concessions and organizational ones like the Association of Serb Municipalities. I also expect flim flam: claims of success that turn out to be fake.
I should have added to RTK: compromises on sovereignty could come in other forms, like sharing of Trepca or international management of Gazivoda, for example. Many countries enter into economic arrangements to share disputed or shared resources. They should be examined on the merits of their contributions to national interests as well as their consistency with the Kosovo constitution. Serbia will want to do likewise. Reciprocity should be the fundamental principle.
I will be surprised if Belgrade agrees to recognize Kosovo and establish diplomatic relations with it. Surprised, but also pleased.
Stevenson’s army, August 19
– State is denying documents to House, not Senate
– SecState Pompeo cancels briefings for HFAC
– I share the basic political science judgment that there are few truly Independent voters; most lean regularly to one party. But there are changeable voters, though few, as WSJ reports.
– Rare good news from Afghanistan: Taliban stopped attacking US troops.
– Administration drops insistence on China, willing to discuss extending New START with Russia.
– WSJ says Xi is purging domestic security forces.
– Now that reporters have had time to review Senate Intell report, here are some key points from NYT and Vox.
My SAIS colleague Charlie Stevenson distributes this almost daily news digest of foreign/defense/national security policy to “Stevenson’s army” via Googlegroups. I plan to republish here. To get Stevenson’s army by email, send a blank email (no subject or text in the body) to stevensons-army+subscribe@googlegroups.com. You’ll get an email confirming your join request. Click “Join This Group” and follow the instructions to join. Once you have joined, you can adjust your email delivery preferences (if you want every email or a digest of the emails).