Month: December 2020

Stevenson’s army, December 15

I have some advice for Gen. Austin if he wants to be Secretary of Defense.
I still oppose a waiver for him — and note that the Washington Examiner says Austin is looking to make several retired Army officers his immediate advisers.

Defense News has a list of possible names for DOD Deputy Secretary.
Russia hacked many federal agencies.
Lawfare has more background.

US imposed milder sanctions on Turkey than the law allows.
FP says Belarus security forces may change sides.

She’ll be taking an oath to support and defend the Constitution.

My SAIS colleague Charlie Stevenson distributes this almost daily news digest of foreign/defense/national security policy to “Stevenson’s army” via Googlegroups. I plan to republish here. To get Stevenson’s army by email, send a blank email (no subject or text in the body) to stevensons-army+subscribe@googlegroups.com. You’ll get an email confirming your join request. Click “Join This Group” and follow the instructions to join. Once you have joined, you can adjust your email delivery preferences (if you want every email or a digest of the emails).

Tags : , ,

Rationality triumphs for now, but irrationality remains

Today two events mark the return of rationality to America on two fronts:

  1. The Electoral College vote for Joe Biden to President;
  2. The first vaccinations against Covid-19.

It’s ironic of course that the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines were developed in record time by companies run mainly by immigrants, while Donald Trump was President. He claimed the epidemic was a hoax and would go away. He has tried to block as much immigration as he could.

The only hoax was his epidemic claim. The vaccine is real.

On the electoral front, Trump has lost more than four dozen legal cases filed to overturn the election results. He intends to continue the fight in court. Why shouldn’t he? It is filling his coffers with donations and ensuring that he remains in control of the Republican Party. Never mind that his defiance of the outcome hurts his country and confidence in its electoral system.

If, as many Republicans fear, the President’s claims of electoral fraud reduce Republican turnout in the January 5 Senate run-offs in Georgia, that would be a good thing. Democrats will be voting in record numbers, if they are allowed to do so. Republicans are still trying to limit absentee voting by mail and the number of drop boxes for submission of ballots.

If the Republicans win only one of the two seats in question, Mitch McConnell will continue to have the majority in the Senate and therefore the capability of stymying Biden’s legislative agenda. He is doing that even now, as Republicans and Democrats are negotiating a further Covid-19 stimulus package intended to relieve not only financial pressure on individuals but also on states. McConnell will hope to be able to stick Biden with the blame for the second dip of the Covid-19 recession, even though it has likely begun during the Trump Administration.

Biden’s win in the Electoral College should not obscure the deep and abiding irrationality of its continued use. It was invented to protect slave states. It risks electing a president with as big a loss in the popular vote as Trump suffered: more than 7 million votes. Biden’s win is due to a margin of 40,000 that put him over the top in the closest call states. But fixing this anomaly requires either a constitutional amendment, which is virtually impossible, or approval of the “compact” that would pledge a majority of the Electoral College votes to the winner of the popular vote. That isn’t likely either.

Irrationality will persist also in the world of vaccines. A lot of people are saying they won’t take it. I am not one who ignores the risk: none of the vaccines has been tested more than a few months. There are no data to demonstrate there are no long-term effects. But given the benefits of vaccination and the eventual “herd immunity,” it makes a lot more sense to run the risks than not to do so. But I expect many of the racists who are claiming that the election was stolen will also want to refuse vaccinations. But that is not what the White House that failed to prepare or respond adequately to the epidemic is doing. Its staff, not mentioned in CDC’s priorities, is among the very first getting vaccinated.

So yes, for today rationality triumphs. But the deep irrationality not only of the Electoral College but also of the White House who supported a failed president abides.

Tags : ,

Stevenson’s army, December 14

The Electoral College members meet and vote today in the various states. Early voting starts in Georgia. Congress is moving toward a two-pronged Covid relief bill.
Russia achieved a major hack of Treasury and Commerce.
Congress fears US nuclear command, control and communications is vulnerable

The president now has 10 days to decide whether to veto the NDAA. In a puzzling statement, he says the bill favors China..  [Maybe he hasn’t read the sections on the Pacific Deterrence Initiative and other China sections.]
CFR has summary of new ideas for better crisis management at NSC.

My SAIS colleague Charlie Stevenson distributes this almost daily news digest of foreign/defense/national security policy to “Stevenson’s army” via Googlegroups. I plan to republish here. To get Stevenson’s army by email, send a blank email (no subject or text in the body) to stevensons-army+subscribe@googlegroups.com. You’ll get an email confirming your join request. Click “Join This Group” and follow the instructions to join. Once you have joined, you can adjust your email delivery preferences (if you want every email or a digest of the emails).

Tags : , , , , , ,

Peace Picks | December 14 – December 18, 2020

Notice: Due to public health concerns, upcoming events are only available via live stream.

1. After Flood and Revolution: Sudanese Responses to a Lagging Transitional Government | December 14, 2020 | 10:00 – 11:15 AM ET | Middle East Institute | Register Here

In 2018, the Sudanese Revolution gained prominence on social media and drew international attention to the movement taking place against Omar Al-Bashir’s 30 year dictatorship in the country. Widespread protests were sparked by drastic policies meant to prevent economic collapse such as the slashing of bread and fuel subsidies. Two years later, grievances remain as Sudan continues to face a multitude of issues including record breaking floods, poor governance, incoming Ethiopians and Eritreans fleeing conflict, and persistent militia violence. The Sudanese people have begun to lose patience with the Transitional Government’s inability to sufficiently reform the system and respond to crises.  

How has Sudan adapted to both environmental and political upheaval? What changes have occured since Omar Al-Bashir was ousted? How does Prime Minister Abdallah Hamdok plan to move forward with the reconstruction of Sudan’s constitutional system, and how could the violence in Ethiopia and Eritrea affect that? In what ways, do we see Sudan’s relationship with foreign allies changing amidst this reconstruction? In this panel, the Middle East Institute (MEI)  brings together experts to explore what the future of Sudan looks like, and what the revolution succeeded and failed to bring the people. 

Speakers

Isma’il Kushkush: Independent Sudanese journalist

Baha Sharief: Women’s economic empowerment advocate

Jérôme Tubiana: Africa desk director, International Federation for Human Rights

Mohamed Soliman, moderator: Non-resident scholar, MEI

Additional speakers TBA

2. Reducing the Nuclear Threat: A 5-Point Plan | December 14, 2020 | 1:00 – 2:00 PM ET | Carnegie Endowment for International Peace | Register Here

A global nuclear arms race is underway, and the threat of nuclear war is growing. Drivers of escalation—ballistic missile defense, nonstrategic nuclear weapons, and China’s nuclear modernization—cannot be easily managed through treaties, so what can be done to mitigate the real risks of the nuclear contest?

Please join us for a conversation featuring James Acton, as he shares insights from a new Carnegie report, “Revamping Nuclear Arms Control: Five Near-Term Proposals,” co-authored with Carnegie Endowment scholars Thomas MacDonald and Pranay Vaddi. Acton will be joined by Kristin Ven Bruusgaard of the University of Oslo. Anita Friedt, who served as a U.S. principal deputy assistant secretary of state, will moderate.

Speakers

James M. Acton: Jessica T. Mathews Chair, co-director of the Nuclear Policy Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

Kristin Ven Bruusgaard: postdoctoral fellow in the Political Science Department at the University of Oslo.

Anita Friedt: former U.S. principal deputy assistant secretary of state.

3. Ten Years After the Arab Spring: Middle East Writers Reflect on the Arab Uprising | December 14, 2020 | 12:00 – 1:00 PM ET | Middle East Institute | Register Here

The Middle East Institute’s Arts and Culture Center and the Alan Cheuse International Writers Center at George Mason University are pleased to mark the 10th anniversary of the Arab Spring with a series of monthly talks with leading writers from the region. Ten Years After The Arab Spring, which launches this December, will feature the voices of award-winning writers from Arab Spring countries reflecting on the past ten years through the lens of their writings and personal experiences.

The inaugural event will feature award-winning Tunisian writer Yamen Manai discussing his newly translated novel The Ardent Swarm (originally published as L’Amas Ardent in 2017). In his novel, Manai celebrates Tunisia’s rich oral culture, a tradition abounding in wry, often fatalistic humor. The book is a stirring allegory about a country in the aftermath of a revolution, told through the simple and hermetic life of Sidi, a bee whisperer.

Speakers

Yamen Manai was born in 1980 in Tunis and currently lives in Paris. Both a writer and an engineer, Manai explores in his prose the intersections of past and present, and tradition and technology. 

Matthew Davis is the founding director of the Alan Cheuse International Writers Center. He’s the author of When Things Get Dark: A Mongolian Winter’s Tale and his work has appeared in the New Yorker, the Atlantic, the Washington Post Magazine and Guernica, among other places.

4. Vanishing Media Freedoms Across South Asia | December 15, 2020 | 9:00 – 10:30 AM ET | United States Institute for Peace | Register Here

Across South Asia, an already challenging climate for free media appears to have further deteriorated in the past year. The 2020 World Press Freedom Index has seen India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Sri Lanka slip down the annual rankings, with all four South Asian countries in the bottom third worldwide. The challenges to free media in South Asia are myriad—particularly threats to journalists’ safety and freedom, repressive actions and overt censorship by governments, unravelling business models, and a chaotic online environment. In many cases, the coronavirus pandemic has exacerbated the threats that journalists and media outlets face as economic pressures have intensified and governments seek to further restrict media freedoms.

Speakers

Tamanna Salikuddin, opening remarks: Director, South Asia, U.S. Institute of Peace

Shahidul Alam: Managing Director, Drik Picture Library Ltd. (Bangladesh)

Dilrukshi Handunnetti: Executive Director, Center for Investigative Reporting (Sri Lanka)

Siddharth Varadarajan: Founding Editor, The Wire (India)

Cyril Almeida, moderator: Visiting Senior Expert, U.S. Institute of Peace; Former Assistant Editor, Dawn Newspaper (Pakistan)

5. Foreign Policy is Climate Policy: New Modes of Multilateralism & the Call for a More Equitable and Just World | December 16, 2020 | 3:30 – 5:00 PM ET | Wilson Center | Register Here

How can the foreign policy community harness the transformative power of the new leadership coalitions that have emerged to strengthen the UNFCCC process—an indispensable mode of diplomacy? And as decision-makers push forward on climate action, how can they incorporate the increasingly compelling calls for social and racial justice into efforts to address climate change? 

Speakers

Lauren Herzer Risi, introduction: Project Director, Environmental Change and Security Program

Maxine Burkett, moderator: Global Fellow; Professor, William S. Richardson School of Law, University of Hawai’i

Jennifer Austin: Director of Policy and Strategy, COP26 High Level Climate Champions team

Julie Cerqueira: Executive Director, U.S. Climate Alliance

Rt Hon David Lammy: Member of Parliament for Tottenham, Shadow Secretary of State for Justice, United Kingdom

Elan Strait: Director, U.S. Climate Campaigns, World Wildlife Fund; Manager, We Are Still In

6. The Creeping Threat of Climate Change | December 16, 2020 | 9:00 – 10:00 AM ET | Middle East Institute | Register Here

Climate change is slowly stamping an imprint on Egypt’s environment, culture, and economy. The most obvious of these challenges is the rising scarcity of water. Egypt is already one of the world’s most water scarce countries; while the UN assesses water scarcity at 1,000 cm3 per person annually, Egypt has less than 560 cm3 per person. Rapid population growth, urbanization, desertification, and unpredictable weather patterns are all taking an unrelenting toll on the country’s strained water resources, while fear is climbing over loss of water from the Nile if the Great Ethiopian Renaissance Dam holds back water during droughts.

Just as worrisome is rising heat. This threatens health, water supplies and, in a country where over 30 percent of the labour force is directly involved in agriculture, Egypt’s harvests.

While there has been much work done on water conservation, climate change mitigation policy is unclear. Much of the action is handled by the private sector which is not always invested in the strictest environmental standards. Is it possible to tackle the oncoming threat while balancing mitigation with the need for development?

Please join us for the first of a series of events on climate change mitigation, part of the Middle East Institute’s Egypt program’s upcoming work on hidden threats and imminent challenges.

Speakers

Abla Abdel Latif: Chair, Presidential Advisory Council for Economic Development; executive director and director of research, Egyptian Center for Economic Studies 

Sarah El-Battouty: Founder and chairperson, ECOnsult

Mirette F. Mabrouk, moderator: Senior fellow and director, Egypt program, MEI 

Additional speakers TBD

7. China’s Influence on Conflict Dynamics in South Asia | December 16, 2020 | 10:30 AM – 12:00 PM ET | United States Institute for Peace| Register Here

China’s expanding presence in South Asia is reshaping the region, and along the way exacerbating tensions in regional politics and U.S.-China relations from the Himalayan mountains to the Indian Ocean. As the United States works to fulfill its vision of a free and open Indo-Pacific region and to respond to a more assertive China, the final report from USIP’s bipartisan Senior Study Group (SSG) on China and South Asia serves as a road map for the next U.S. administration to advance the Indo portion of that vision.

The SSG’s final report—the fourth in a series—examines China’s influence in South Asian conflict zones and fragile states from a variety of angles. Drawing on the insights of the group’s senior experts, former policymakers, and retired diplomats, the report includes top-level findings and actionable recommendations. 

Join the co-chairs and members of the SSG as they discuss their work and the report’s conclusions. The conversation will tackle topics such as U.S. interests in South Asia amid China’s growing role, Beijing’s interests in and approach toward the region, China-Pakistan relations, China-India relations, and China’s relations with the smaller South Asian states. 

Speakers

Jennifer Staats, introductory remarks: Director of East and Southeast Asia Programs, U.S. Institute of Peace; USIP China Senior Study Group Series Executive Director

Richard G. Olson, report briefing: Senior Advisor, United States Institute of Peace; Co-Chair, USIP China-South Asia Senior Study Group

Randall G. Schriver, report briefing: Chairman of the Board, The Project 2049 Institute; Co-Chair, USIP China-South Asia Senior Study Group

Alyssa Ayres: Senior Fellow for India, Pakistan, and South Asia, Council on Foreign Relations; Member, USIP China-South Asia Senior Study Group

Patrick Cronin: Asia-Pacific Security Chair, Hudson Institute; Member, USIP China-South Asia Senior Study Group

Sameer Lalwani: Senior Fellow and Director of the South Asia Program, Stimson Center; Member, USIP China-South Asia Senior Study Group

Anja Manuel: Co-Founder and Partner, Rice, Hadley, Gates & Manuel LLC; Member, USIP China-South Asia Senior Study Group

Daniel Markey: Senior Research Professor in International Relations, Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies; Member, USIP China-South Asia Senior Study Group

Tamanna Salikuddin: Director of South Asia Programs, United States Institute of Peace; Member, USIP China-South Asia Senior Study Group

Vikram J. Singh: Senior Advisor, Asia Center, United States Institute of Peace; Member, USIP China-South Asia Senior Study Group

Jacob Stokes: Senior Policy Analyst, China Program, U.S. Institute of Peace; Project Director, USIP China-South Asia Senior Study Group

8. The Biden Administration and Iran—Confrontation or Accommodation | December 17, 2020 | 10:00 – 11:00 AM ET | Carnegie Endowment for Peace | Register Here

Iran will almost certainly  be a top priority of the incoming Biden Administration. Not only are dealing with Iran’s nuclear ambitions expected to be high on the U.S. agenda; but escalating tensions on the ground between Iran, Israel and the United States in 2020 may well intensify in 2021 and the United States will need to prepared to contain them.

How do Tehran and Jerusalem intend to approach the new administration; what priorities, calculations, and attitudes will shift? And how will the Biden foreign policy team deal with the complex challenge of reentering and/or renegotiating the Iran nuclear accord as well as engaging the other international parties still committed to the JPCOA? Finally, what role will domestic politics in Washington, Tehran, and Jerusalem play in shaping events  as they unfold? 

Speakers

Aaron David Miller: senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, focusing on U.S. foreign policy.

Suzanne Maloney: vice president and director of the Foreign Policy program at the Brookings Institution. She previously worked on Middle East issues in the State Department and in the private sector and has published three books on Iran.

Karim Sadjadpour: senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, where he focuses on Iran and U.S. foreign policy toward the Middle East.

Michael Singh: Lane-Swig Senior Fellow and managing director at The Washington Institute and a former senior director for Middle East affairs at the National Security Council.

9. The Arab Spring, Ten Years On: What Have We Learned and Where Are We Going?| December 17, 2020 | 4:00 – 5:15 PM ET | Brookings Institute | Register Here

The popular protests that unfolded across the Arab region in 2011 seemed poised to usher in a new era of freedom and democracy. Ten years on, however, the future does not seem as bright. Tunisia is the only Arab country to have successfully transitioned into a democracy; other countries have either reverted to strong authoritarian rule or have become mired in devastating civil wars.

The underlying socio-economic and political factors that led to the “Arab Spring” continue to drive unrest across the region. The recent protests in Algeria, Iraq, and Sudan show that social activists have learned from the mistakes of the past and adopted new tactics, forcing those in power to make unexpected concessions. In turn, Arab leaders have also adapted, fighting back calls for change with targeted propaganda campaigns and repressive crackdowns.

The Brookings Doha Center invites you to attend a webinar that takes stock of the Arab Spring and its impact on the region over the past decade. The discussion will address the following questions: On balance, what was the outcome of the Arab Spring? How have Arab social movements and leaders evolved in the years since? Can we expect new protests in countries experiencing economic and political strains? And how can the region address the demands of its people and build an inclusive social contract?

Speakers

Joseph Bahout: Director at the Issam Fares Institute for Public Policy and International Affairs – American University of Beirut

Lina Khatib: Director of the Middle East and North Africa Programme – Chatham House

Michele Dunne: Director of the Middle East Program – Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

Nader Kabbani, moderator: Director of Research – Brookings Doha CenterSenior Fellow – Global Economy and Development

10. Democracy and Corruption in the Democratic Republic of the Congo Two Years into the Tshisekedi Administration | December 18, 2020 | 10:00 – 11:00 AM ET | Brookings Institute | Register Here

Nearly two years after the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) saw a peaceful transfer of power to President Félix Tshisekedi following a nevertheless flawed election, numerous significant political and economic developments have transpired in the country. The president’s chief of staff, Vital Kamerhe, was convicted on corruption charges; violent conflicts have increased in the eastern DRC; civil society has mounted increasing anti-corruption campaigns; and political maneuvering is already starting in preparation for the 2023 elections. Meanwhile, in a bipartisan letter, the U.S. Senate highlighted the need for urgent anti-corruption and electoral reforms in the country and the International Monetary Fund is considering a significant loan to stabilize the country’s economy, pending anti-corruption reforms.

Speakers

Michael E. O’Hanlon, moderator: Director of Research – Foreign PolicyCo-Director – Center for Security, Strategy, and Technology, Africa Security InitiativeSenior Fellow – Foreign Policy, Center for Security, Strategy, and TechnologyThe Sydney Stein, Jr. Chair

Sasha Lezhnev: Deputy Director of Policy – The Sentry Project

Mvemba P. Dizolele: Senior Associate (Non-Resident) – CSIS

John G. Tomaszewski: Professional Staffer – Senate Foreign Relations Committee

André Wameso: Ambassador – Democratic Republic of the Congo

Tags : , , , , , , ,

Trump is out, but he’ll continue to whine

Friday night the Supreme Court decided not to take up Donald Trump’s Hail Mary, a Texas-originated lawsuit contesting the election procedures in four other states and seeking to transfer responsibility for deciding the election results to their legislatures. More than half the Republicans in the House of Representatives and 17 or so other states backed this ridiculous “press release masquerading as a lawsuit.” The Electoral College is now set to cast its votes tomorrow in favor of President-elect Biden.

The drama however still won’t be over. January 5 Georgia will conduct a run-off election for two Senate seats. That will determine which party will control the upper house. January 6 the electoral votes will be considered in a joint session of Congress. PBS describes the process there:

If at least one member of each house objects in writing to some electoral votes, the House and Senate meet separately to debate the issue. Both houses must vote to sustain the objection for it to matter, and the Democratic-led House is unlikely to go along with any objections to votes for Biden. Otherwise, the votes get counted as intended by the states.

I suppose we can expect some objections from the Republicans, if only to delay the inevitable, but the results won’t change. Joe Biden will be inaugurated January 20.

Donald Trump will continue whining. He has two purposes:

  1. To maintain control over the Republican base and party (two sides of the same coin).
  2. To raise money that he can use for ostensibly political purposes, including hiring family members as “consultants.”

I doubt he will be able, even if willing, to run in 2024, as he is promising to do. He is not physically fit and will be 78 by the time of the 2025 inauguration. Yes, that is Biden’s age, but Biden is seemingly in a lot better shape. Trump will be thoroughly tied up with legal and financial difficulties by then. But he’ll want to be in a position to “forecast the election lights,” possibly to Don Jr.

Trump’s refusal to retire quietly to bookwriting and elder statesmanship, as American presidents generally do, is understandable. He couldn’t write a book if he tried, though he could hire a ghost writer as he has in the past. Statesmanship requires concern with the ship of state that he entirely lacks. His sole concerns are with himself and his family, particularly the related bank accounts. Those require him to remain in the limelight.

That raises the question of what he will do during the next 39 days. He has already announced troop withdrawals from Iraq, Afghanistan, and Somalia and is flying B52s to the Gulf. The mixed message–he wants out of the Middle East but wants to kick Iranian butt for failing to respond to his thousand overtures offering a return to negotiations–is just one more incoherent moment in four years of incoherence. Nor is it likely that conditions for withdrawal from Iraq, Afghanistan, and Somalia happen to be right precisely at the moment Trump is leaving office.

Once again, the country’s interests are being sacrificed for the sake of Trump’s. He wants to be able to claim he ended wars. But there is precious little reason to believe that American interests will be well-served by the withdrawals, which come without adequate diplomatic preparation. Zal Khalilzad was trying hard in Afghanistan to get a settlement that might hold after US withdrawal, but he has had the carpet pulled out from under him prematurely.

Trump is out come January 20, but he’ll continue to whine. I’m hoping the media learns to ignore him.

Stevenson’s army, December 12

– Lawfare study finds Congress doesn’t know what it needs to about executive agreements.
– Also on Lawfare, an explanation and critique  of new executive order on civil service.
– Former intelligence official has new suggestions for whole of government policymaking.
– Cong. Nunes is blocking intelligence authorization bill.
Atlantic writer notes election problems in red states’ equipment.

My SAIS colleague Charlie Stevenson distributes this almost daily news digest of foreign/defense/national security policy to “Stevenson’s army” via Googlegroups. I plan to republish here. To get Stevenson’s army by email, send a blank email (no subject or text in the body) to stevensons-army+subscribe@googlegroups.com. You’ll get an email confirming your join request. Click “Join This Group” and follow the instructions to join. Once you have joined, you can adjust your email delivery preferences (if you want every email or a digest of the emails).

Tags : , ,
Tweet