– NYT has its own ticktock of DC policymaking.
-Fareed Zakaria says there were too many meetings that didn’t matter, also cites data on topheavy DOD.
-Former NIC chair says Afghanistan didn’t really have a “government.”
-NYT warns Afghanistan faces economic shock.
– At last, US military finds “alternative routes ” to airport.
– RollCall reports Congressional Management Foundation “oscars” for Congress.
Charlie adds:
Who needs another 549-page history of American foreign policy? Maybe you do. At least you should take a look at Robert Zoellick’s America in the World (Twelve, 2020). The author is not a trained historian, but a broadly experienced Washington policymaker who has served as U.S. Trade Representative, White House Deputy Chief of Staff, and State Department Under Secretary, Counselor, and Deputy Secretary as well as President of the World Bank.
Zoellick has written an incomplete, episodic, but insightful history of the most significant American policies abroad. Organized around key figures from Alexander Hamilton and John Quincy Adams through John Hay and Charles Evans Hughes to recent U.S. Presidents, Zoellick sees economic and trade policies as important to his analyses as the traditional security narratives. That in itself is a useful corrective and valuable addition to our histories.
Time and again he offers personal anecdotes echoing his discussions of earlier events. For example, he concludes his analysis of the failure of Lyndon Johnson’s staff to warn him of their own doubts about Vietnam by citing times when his own bosses failed to give their presidents bad news. And he tells how Secretary of State James Baker paved the way for sensitive negotiations by making repeated face-saving concessions to another diplomat.
What I found especially new and valuable were his chapters on Charles Evans Hughes and Elihu Root. The first explains how America got into the diplomacy of arms control and the second is the best I’ve ever read about how legalism came to dominate U.S. foreign policy. His Cordell Hull chapter describes how the Tennessee lawmaker brought a radical change in trade policy. He uses Vannevar Bush to explain how the U.S. government embraced technological innovation for military security and economic prosperity.
He cites other historians with alternative views of post-1945 controversies and then adds his own assessments. He sprinkles his chapters with revealing incidents.
There’s not much about 21st century foreign policy except passing references, but his perspectives on America’s first two centuries are quite worthwhile.
My SAIS colleague Charlie Stevenson distributes this almost daily news digest of foreign/defense/national security policy to “Stevenson’s army” via Googlegroups. I plan to republish here. To get Stevenson’s army by email, send a blank email (no subject or text in the body) to stevensons-army+subscribe@googlegroups.com. You’ll get an email confirming your join request. Click “Join This Group” and follow the instructions to join. Once you have joined, you can adjust your email delivery preferences (if you want every email or a digest of the emails).
The Administration is weakening the United States. That is the only thing at which it…
This war should end with a prosperous, democratic Ukraine in Europe. If I can contribute…
The question is whether the demonstrators can exploit the moment to unseat a wily and…
US aid will be a cash cow for Trump donors, a mainstay of autocratic regimes…
Might makes right can work for a while. But in the end they will need…
The simple fact is we were better off on January 19 than we are today.…