Category: Daniel Serwer

Stevenson’s army, February 17

– FT says China is considering limiting rare earth exports to US. That could jeopardize F-35 program and other things, as CRS explains.
– FT also says Macron plans pullout from Sahel.
– NYT says Biden aides divided over Afghan policy.
– GMF sees tensions in Turkish-Iranian relations.
-DOD report finds evidence of white supremacists in US military.

My SAIS colleague Charlie Stevenson distributes this almost daily news digest of foreign/defense/national security policy to “Stevenson’s army” via Googlegroups. I plan to republish here. To get Stevenson’s army by email, send a blank email (no subject or text in the body) to stevensons-army+subscribe@googlegroups.com. You’ll get an email confirming your join request. Click “Join This Group” and follow the instructions to join. Once you have joined, you can adjust your email delivery preferences (if you want every email or a digest of the emails).

Tags : , , , , ,

Stevenson’s army, February 16

– CNN has a typical day.
– WSJ’s Seib says he’s blending economic and foreign policy.
– WSJ says DOD is going big on  robotics.
-CNAS writer has good to-do list for SecDef Austin.
– Erdogan blasts US for support to Kurds.

My SAIS colleague Charlie Stevenson distributes this almost daily news digest of foreign/defense/national security policy to “Stevenson’s army” via Googlegroups. I plan to republish here. To get Stevenson’s army by email, send a blank email (no subject or text in the body) to stevensons-army+subscribe@googlegroups.com. You’ll get an email confirming your join request. Click “Join This Group” and follow the instructions to join. Once you have joined, you can adjust your email delivery preferences (if you want every email or a digest of the emails).

Tags : , , , , ,

What Kosovo needs now is not only Serbian recognition

Kosovo’s early elections have produced, as expected, a clear victory for Vetevendosje (VV or “Self-Determination”). According to preliminary results, it has won close to 48% and a commanding lead of something over 50 seats in the 120-seata Kosovo Assembly.

This is Albin Kurti’s moment. The still young, articulate VV leader had a couple of months in the Prime Minister’s chair last year. The Trump Administration didn’t like his insistence on reciprocity with Serbia or his skepticism about Trump’s bizarre choice of an American envoy. Washington took advantage of a squabble within his coalition to bring him down. That isn’t likely this time around, not only because of VV’s strong showing at the polls but also because Trump is gone. The Biden Administration will at least try to be respectful of Kosovo’s democracy.

That however won’t save Albin from a bigger challenge: constructing the kind of majority in parliament that will enable election of a new president as well as a strong position in negotiations with Serbia. Both in practice require a two-thirds majority. Part of the difference will come from ethnic minority parties, but at least one more Albanian-based party will be needed. Two obvious candidates both have a bad history with VV: the LDK, running a poor third in yesterday’s election, brought down Albin’s short-lived coalition last year and VV has been a stern critic of the second-place Democratic Party of Kosovo (PDK), in particular its now-indicted former President Hashim Thaci. Ramush Haradinaj’s Alliance for the Future of Kosovo (AAK) will not have enough seats to get VV to two-thirds, but it would be step in that direction.

Kosovo’s parliamentary system has often produced long inter-regna. Albin could cut this one short by acting unilaterally, but that might make forming the necessary coalition later more difficult rather than less. Negotiations with Serbia and electing a new president will not be top priorities for VV. Albin would prefer to focus on his campaign priorities: jobs and justice. That will not be easy, as Covid-19 has hit the Kosovo economy hard and reform of the justice system is a long-term project. The Americans and Europeans will be trying to get Pristina to engage as soon as possible on the dialogue with Belgrade, which faces presidential and likely parliamentary elections by April 2022 (and possibly earlier). No serious negotiations with Serbia will be possible after the end of this year.

Though the EU aims at it, there is little prospect of a “final” agreement within that timeframe. Serbian President Vucic has made eminently clear he will not recognize Kosovo before his re-election, if then. Some interim confidence-building steps might be possible, focused on missing people from the 1999 war and implementation of the several dozen existing agreements between Belgrade and Pristina, few of which have been executed to the satisfaction of both capitals. In any event, Pristina will need to be ready to walk away from a bad agreement in order to get a good one. Albin would do well to match Vucic’s reluctance.

A more comprehensive agreement is however needed. Serbia’s refusal to recognize its erstwhile “autonomous province” leaves Kosovo in international limbo with unclear and unmarked borders, enabling Serbia to undermine its statehood, territorial integrity, and sovereignty. But it also leaves Serbia without the “good neighborly relations” required for EU membership. The two capitals would do well to contemplate seriously the much-mentioned German/German solution, which entailed UN membership for the German Democratic Republic as well as ambassadorial-level representation in both capitals but no formal recognition. No one who knows Kosovo would expect the longer-term outcome to be like Germany’s (i.e. re-incorporation of Kosovo into Serbia).

If Kurti, either as leader of VV or prime minister, is even modestly successful in using the next couple of years to deliver on “jobs and justice,” Kosovo will find itself in a far stronger position to negotiate successfully with Serbia. A stronger economy and a judicial system that can handle both inter-ethnic crime and high-level corruption would make both Washington and Brussels more unequivocal in their support. Success would also enable a stronger position on reciprocity with Belgrade. Albin Kurti has big shoes to fill: his own.

Tags : , ,

Stevenson’s army, February 12 and 13

I didn’t get to it yesterday, so here is two days worth:

February 13

– Major shakeup in Senate Appropriations — Sen. Leahy becomes chairman, but loses his chairmanship of State/Foreign Ops after many decades. Full roster here.
– State de-lists Houthis as terrorists.
– Biden keeps tariffs on European wine & cheese [Darn]

February 12

This is the year of the ox.
Technology issues are a major part of the Biden administration’s China policy. Note these:
Export restrictions expected.
Supply chain issues important.
Press reports say Jennifer Harris, co-author of War by other means [assigned for week 6] will be NSC director for foreign economic policy.
Fred Kaplan says Pence’s “nuclear football” was evacuated with him.

My SAIS colleague Charlie Stevenson distributes this almost daily news digest of foreign/defense/national security policy to “Stevenson’s army” via Googlegroups. I plan to republish here. To get Stevenson’s army by email, send a blank email (no subject or text in the body) to stevensons-army+subscribe@googlegroups.com. You’ll get an email confirming your join request. Click “Join This Group” and follow the instructions to join. Once you have joined, you can adjust your email delivery preferences (if you want every email or a digest of the emails).

Tags : , , , , ,

Trump’s win in the Senate could spell his party’s loss

Donald Trump’s impeachment trial has turned into a slam dunk. The Democrats have demonstrated beyond a shadow of doubt that he incited the rioting on January 6 and failed to do what he could to call it off, in a vain effort to prevent certification of the Electoral College vote after a months-long campaign of lies about electoral fraud. His defense was to claim he could say anything he wanted because the constitution guarantees free speech and anyway he shouldn’t be tried because he is no longer president.

Lots of luck with that. The Senate already voted on the jurisdictional question and the free speech argument is specious: he is accused of violating his oath of office by inciting an insurrection against people performing a constitutionally-mandated procedure. There is no free speech defense from that accusation. The poor performance of Trump’s lawyers and the stunningly well-organization presentations by the Democratic House “managers” were both notable. On the merits, Trump has lost.

But odds are he will win the vote for acquittal. Too many Republicans joined him in his lies about election fraud for the Democrats to be able to turn the 17 needed to convict with a two-thirds majority. They would be convicting themselves as well as Trump. They also fear he will support rivals in their primaries if they vote against him. Theirs is a remarkable display of cowardice.

This quisling behavior may also doom the Republican Party. I would like to see Trump held accountable by a conviction and exclusion from future office, but the Democrats may find acquittal more to their political advantage than conviction.

Conviction with the necessary Republican votes would signal the departure of the Republican Party from Trumpism. Their House incumbents could then run in 2022 credibly claiming that they had purged the poison, as Nikki Halley is already doing, and would return to their traditional vocation as a right-of-center party, one with truth-based positions on the economy, immigration, race, trade, and other major issues. They could try to recruit more minority voters and present themselves as champions of self-reliance, frugality, Christianity, and traditional values.

That is going to be much harder if Trump is acquitted. He will then remain the dominant force in the Republican Party, carrying all the baggage of Trumpism: racism, tax cuts for the rich, growing deficits rather than jobs, fighting and losing trade wars, failing to fight the Covid-19 epidemic, and building an unnecessary and fabulously expensive border fence (not paid for by Mexico). None of those features of Trumpism are going to look pretty in two years, when Trump will insist on more QAnon conspiracists as Republican candidates.

Forty per cent of Americans will still stick with Trump’s GOP, which is enough to get it close to a majority in the House and Senate due to gerrymandering and Republican strength in less populated states, which have two senators like California and New York. But it is nowhere near enough to win the popular vote for President, even if it wins the Electoral College. Only one Republican (George W.) has won both the White House and the popular vote since George H.W. Bush in 1988.

Joe Biden’s popularity is already well above Trump’s peak. He (or Kamala Harris) may well do better against a GOP candidate in 2024 who tries to follow in Trump’s footsteps than one who has managed a return to serious conservatism. Trump’s win in the Senate could well spell his party’s loss.

Tags : ,

Stevenson’s army, February 11

– Biden announces China review by DOD.  In visit to Pentagon, her also discusses his views on use of force.

– Axios tells of first Biden call to Xi.
– At Lawfare, analysts call for new economic tools to deal with China. [Pay attention: class will have foreign economic policy exercise related to China.]
Sanctions on Myanmar.
Defense cost-sharing deal with South Korea almost done
French think tank looks at defense issues.
Trump people botched investigation of injuries to diplomats in Cuba.

My SAIS colleague Charlie Stevenson distributes this almost daily news digest of foreign/defense/national security policy to “Stevenson’s army” via Googlegroups. I plan to republish here. To get Stevenson’s army by email, send a blank email (no subject or text in the body) to stevensons-army+subscribe@googlegroups.com. You’ll get an email confirming your join request. Click “Join This Group” and follow the instructions to join. Once you have joined, you can adjust your email delivery preferences (if you want every email or a digest of the emails).

Tags : , , , , ,
Tweet