Tag: Afghanistan

Peace picks next week

Too much this week, and too many things at the same time on the same days, but here are my best bets:

1. The Arab Spring, a Year On: How’s America Faring? WWC, 9:30-11 am April 23

Nathan Brown
Professor of Political Science and International Affairs, George Washington University and Former Fellow, Woodrow Wilson Center

Ellen Laipson
President and CEO, Stimson Center

Michael Singh
Managing Director, Washington Institute for Near East Policy

Moderator

Aaron David Miller
Distinguished Scholar, Woodrow Wilson Center

Political changes in the Arab world have created a new landscape for the United States. Join us as four experts on the region and its politics examine the impact of these changes on hopes for democratization and Arab-Israeli peace, as well as the future of American influence and interests.

Location:
6th Floor, Woodrow Wilson Center
2.  Pakistan-India Trade: What Needs to be Done? What Does it Matter? WWC, 9:45 am-4:15 pm April 23

Last fall, the Pakistan government announced its intention to grant Most Favored Nation (MFN) status to India, replicating a decision made earlier in New Delhi and potentially laying the groundwork for greatly expanded trade between the two South Asian neighbors. While fundamental disagreements in the relationship remain unresolved, Islamabad’s MFN decision suggests that it is prepared to deepen trade ties even while progress on core political and security issues continues to lag. Optimists assert that increased trade can build constituencies in both countries for more cooperative bilateral relations between the two long-time rivals.

Recognizing the potential significance of trade in the Pakistan-India relationship, the Woodrow Wilson Center will host a one-day conference on April 23, 2012, that focuses on MFN as an important step toward expanding Pakistan-India commercial linkages. What further steps on both sides need to be taken to establish a fully operational MFN regime?   What are the economic and businesses cases for and against expanding bilateral trade?  What are the primary domestic obstacles in each country to increased Pakistan-India trade?  What are the socio-economic arguments for enhanced bilateral trade ties, and who will most benefit?

RSVPs are required. Please RSVP by sending an email to asia@wilsoncenter.org

CONFERENCE AGENDA

9:45 Registration and coffee

10:00 Welcoming Remarks

Robert M. Hathaway, director, Asia Program, Woodrow Wilson Center

Munawar Z. Noorani, chairman, Fellowship Fund for Pakistan

10:15 Panel I: Moving forward on MFN

Ijaz Nabi, visiting professor, Lahore University of Management Sciences, and Pakistan country director, International Growth Center

A view from Pakistan

Arvind Virmani, executive director, International Monetary Fund, and affiliate professor and distinguished senior fellow, George Mason University

Perspectives from India

Ishrat Hussain, dean and director, Institute of Business Administration (Karachi)

Dissenting views

Chair: Robert M. Hathaway, director, Asia Program, Woodrow Wilson Center

12:30 Luncheon

1:00 Luncheon keynote address

Zafar Mahmood, commerce secretary, government of Pakistan

Chair: William B. Milam, senior scholar, Woodrow Wilson Center

2:00 Panel II: Broadening the debate

Amin Hashwani, founder, Pakistan-India CEOs Business Forum

Social issues, civil society, and security

Nisha Taneja, professor, Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER)

Non-tariff barriers, infrastructure deficiencies, and high transaction costs

Kalpana Kochhar, chief economist for South Asia, World Bank

Regional implications

Chair: Michael Kugelman, South Asia associate, Woodrow Wilson Center

4:15 Adjournment

RSVPs are required. Please RSVP by sending an email to asia@wilsoncenter.org

This conference has been organized by the Wilson Center’s Asia Program and Program on America and the Global Economy, along with the Fellowship Fund for Pakistan.

This conference has been made possible through the generosity of the Fellowship Fund for Pakistan.

Location:
5th Floor, Woodrow Wilson Center
3.  Afghanistan: Regional Economic Cooperation and Unleashing the Private Sector: Keys to Successful Transfer, Rome Auditorium Johns Hopkins/SAIS, 12:30-2 pm April 23

Summary: Sham Bathija, senior adviser minister for Economic Affairs to the Afghan president, and Noorullah Delawari, governor of the Central Bank of Afghanistan, will discuss this topic. Note: A reception will precede the forum at noon. For more information and to RSVP, contact the SAIS Central Asia-Caucasus Institute at caci2@jhu.edu or 202.663.7721.
4.  The Implications of Democracy and Dynasty: The Foreign Policy Futures of the Two Koreas, Kenney Auditorium SAIS, 2-4 pm April 24
The US-Korea Institute at SAIS and
the Center for Northeast Asian Policy Studies at the Brookings Institution
Present:
The Implications of Democracy and Dynasty:
The Foreign Policy Futures of the Two Koreas

April 24, 2012
2pm – 3:30pm
Kenney Auditorium
1740 Massachusetts Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20036

Featuring:

Dr. Sang Yoon Ma
History and Public Policy Scholar, Woodrow Wilson International Center
Associate Professor, School of International Studies at the Catholic University of Korea

Dr. Alexandre Mansourov
Visiting Scholar, US-Korea Institute at SAIS

With Introduction by:

Dr. Richard C. Bush
Director and Senior Fellow
Center for Northeast Asian Policy Studies, The Brookings Institution

Moderated by:

Dr. Jae H. Ku
Director, US-Korea Institute at SAIS

On April 11, 2012, South Korea’s ruling conservative party scored an  unexpected victory in the 2012 National Assembly elections while a series of political events in North Korea worked to solidify the succession of Kim Jong Un. Please join Dr. Sang Yoon Ma and Dr. Alexandre Mansourov in discussing the results of these events and their policy implications for US-ROK relations, and North Korea’s foreign policy strategies.

5.  A Conversation with Turkey’s Kurdish Leadership, Brookings, 3-4:30 pm April 24

Turkey’s approach to lingering problems in dealing with the Kurdish minority at home and in the region is once again at a critical juncture. From the prospects for a new constitution to Ankara’s Syria dilemma, virtually all the pressing issues facing Turkey have a Kurdish dimension. Most recently, Prime Minister Erdogan declared that his government is ready to engage in a political dialogue with the Kurdish Peace and Democracy Party (BDP) in the Turkish Parliament. Given past failures at dialogue and at finding a mutually-acceptable, peaceful, and democratic solution to the problem, will this time prove different? What do the Kurds of Turkey and those of neighboring nations want and is the ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) ready to meet Kurdish demands?

When

Tuesday, April 24, 2012
3:00 PM to 4:30 PM

Where

Saul/Zilkha Rooms
The Brookings Institution
1775 Massachusetts Ave., NW
Washington, DC
Map

Contact: Brookings Office of Communications

Email: events@brookings.edu

Phone: 202.797.6105

Register Now
On April 24, the Center on the United State and Europe at Brookings (CUSE) will host a discussion exploring these and other important questions related to Turkey’s Kurdish minority, featuring Selahattin Demirtaş, the co-chair of BDP, and Ahmet Turk, an experienced politician currently an independent member of the Turkish Parliament. Brookings Nonresident Senior Fellow Ömer Taşpınar will provide introductory remarks and moderate the discussion.After the program, panelists will take audience questions.

Participants

Introduction and Moderator

Ömer Taşpınar

Nonresident Senior Fellow, Foreign Policy, Center on the United States and Europe

Featured Speakers

Selahattin Demirtaş

Co-Chairman
Peace and Democracy Party (BDP)

Ahmet Türk

Member of Turkish Parliament
Co-chair of the Democratic Society Congress (DTK)

6. (Re)Building an Effective Central Government in Afghanistan and Iraq, RTI International, 12 noon April 25

 When: Wednesday, April 25, 2012, 12:00 p.m. – 2:00 p.m.
Where: RTI International, 701 13th Street, NW, Suite 750, Washington, D.C.

Please join the SID-Washington Governance, Corruption & Rule of Law Workgroup for a panel discussion examining state-building in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The sustainability of governance reforms in Afghanistan and Iraq is a key concern for both the US and its partners, and for citizens of those countries. What has been learned about what works to build, or rebuild, effective government? What challenges remain to be addressed? SID-Washington’s Governance, Corruption, and Rule of Law Workgroup will host a discussion with Larry Cooley, President, Management Systems International, to explore answers to these questions.

Speakers:

Larry Cooley, President, Management Systems International (MSI)

Workgroup Co-Chairs

Derick Brinkerhoff,  Distinguished Fellow, International Public Management, RTI International

Tomas Bridle, Technical Area Manager, Responsive Government Institutions, Economic and Democratic Governance, DAI

Please bring your lunch to enjoy during the event.

 

Tags : , , , , , ,

Peace picks this week

Hard to know what to say about CSIS’s Global Security Forum 2012, but I’ve listed at least one session below.  Lots of other events too:

1. Panel Discussion on Arab Countries in Transition, Stimson, 10-11:30 April 9


Date Monday, April 9
Time 10 – 11:30am
Location Stimson

Stimson Center, Marshall Foundation, and Safadi Foundation USA
are pleased to announce a panel discussion on

ARAB COUNTRIES IN TRANSITION:
An Update on International Support
One Year after the Deauville Partnership

As international leaders prepare to gather next month for the U.S.-hosted G8 summit in Camp David, Arab nations in transition continue to face significant economic challenges.  The Deauville Partnership launched in France at the previous G8 summit in May 2011, established a political and economic framework to support the historic transitions launched by the “Arab Spring.”  What progress has been made since then?  How do G8 members plan to address the deepening economic challenges?  What is the role of international financial institutions?  What are the prospects for this initiative to evolve into a sustainable partnership between the West and the Arab world that ensures the region’s successful transition?

Panelists will discuss the latest initiatives and highlight areas that are in need of greater support.

Featuring:

Masood Ahmed, Director, Middle East and Central Asia Department, International Monetary Fund;

Inger Andersen (invited), Vice-President, Middle East and North Africa, World Bank;

Dr. Peter Howard, Coordinator for the Deauville Partnership, Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs, US Department of State; and

Mona Yacoubian, (Moderator), Director, Pathways to Progress: Peace, Prosperity, and Change in the Middle East Project at the Stimson Center.


Click here to RSVP
or
follow the event live on Twitter at @StimsonCenter

2. Promise and Peril in Nigeria:  Implications for U.S. Engagement, CSIS 3-4:30 pm April 9

 with Ambassador Johnnie Carson
U.S. Department of State
Monday, April 9, 2012, 3:00 p.m. to 4:30 p.m.
B1 Conference Center, CSIS
1800 K St. NW, Washington, DC 20006
Please join the CSIS Africa Program for an address by Ambassador Johnnie Carson, Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs, on U.S. engagement with Nigeria. As Africa’s most populous nation, the world’s eighth largest exporter of oil, a rapidly emerging economic power and investment destination, and a significant player in regional and continental affairs, Nigeria is among the United States’ most important partners in Africa.  At the same time, the violent aftermath of the 2011 national elections, escalating attacks by militant group Boko Haram, a resurgence of violence in the oil-producing Niger Delta, and the continued influence of powerful vested interests underscore the many challenges that the country’s government and citizenry confront. Assistant Secretary Carson will offer his perspective on the breadth and complexity of U.S. engagement with Nigeria and the future of relations with this important U.S. partner.
Please RSVP to Kathryn Havranek at africa@csis.org

3. Integrating Official and Crowdsourced Crisis Information, WWC, 4-5 pm April 9

Crowdsourcing crisis information gathered via the Internet is not new to the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). Since 1999, the USGS Earthquake Hazards Program has been generating Community Internet Intensity Maps (CIIMs) using geographic data submitted to the Did You Feel It? website. This open call to the public is a notable example of how USGS facilitates the sharing of critical crisis information by members of the public not only to provide valuable data for earthquake research at USGS, but also to provide immediate situational awareness for emergency management stakeholders. CIIM is one of the early instances of “crowdsourcing,” consciously developed long before the coining of this term by Jeff Howe in 2006.

New opportunities and challenges are emerging as members of the public use pervasive information and communication technologies,  including social media and social networking sites (e.g., Twitter, Facebook, and user-generated maps), to help in the immediate aftermath of major disasters. The USGS Earthquake Hazards Program has already begun to investigate how to harness crisis data from the crowd via social media sites like Twitter to rapidly detect and characterize earthquake effects. However, as we increasingly have access to ever-growing streams of content online, how can crisis data from government agencies, satellite imagery companies, volunteer technical communities, disaster-affected populations, and the general public be integrated together to better facilitate emergency response, recovery, and mitigation efforts?

In this talk, Dr. Sophia B. Liu will discuss the opportunities and challenges with integrating official and crowdsourced crisis information based on the response to the 2010 Haiti earthquake and what has happened since this catastrophe, which was the tipping point for crowdsourcing and social media use in the crisis domain. Specifically, Dr. Liu will unpack the different interface challenges at the social, technological, organizational, and political levels. She will also discuss the meaning of “socially distributed curation” and its application to information management in the emergency domain.

About the Speaker

Sophia B. Liu, PhD is currently a Mendenhall Postdoctoral research fellow at the U.S. Geological Survey investigating crowdsourced geographic information around earthquakes. She works with Paul Earle at the National Earthquake Information Center in Golden, Colorado as well as Barbara Poore in Saint Petersburg, Florida through the National Geospatial Program and the Core Science Systems strategy. Specifically, Dr. Liu conducts research on the integration of official and crowdsourced geographic information pertaining to earthquakes. In May 2011, she received her PhD from University of Colorado, Boulder (CU) in the Technology, Media and Society interdisciplinary program at the Alliance for Technology, Learning and Society (ATLAS) Institute. In 2006, Dr. Liu was awarded a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship. Her graduate advisor was Professor Leysia Palen in the Department of Computer Science at CU directing Project EPIC (Empowering the Public with Information in Crisis) and the Connectivity Lab, where we conducted research in the emerging area of Crisis Informatics beginning in 2005 working at the intersection of social, technical, and informational aspects of crises and disasters. Her dissertation research focused on the use of social media pertaining to historically significant crises and the emergence of socially-distributed curatorial practices as a way of managing crisis information in the social media landscape. She has given numerous invited talks and guest lectures on the emerging use of social media during mass emergencies and historic disasters.https://profile.usgs.gov/sophialiu

Location:
4th Floor, Woodrow Wilson Center
4.  Whither Pakistan-U.S. Relations? Looking Toward the Afghan Endgame and 2014, WWC, 11-12:30

April 10, 2012

After the September 11, 2001, attacks, Pakistan and the United States entered into a new counterterrorism alliance. Yet ever since then, the relationship between the two nations has been a rocky one. Today, this marriage of convenience seems to be approaching a breaking point. Can the troubled partnership be saved? Or will it dissolve in a messy divorce, as has happened in the past? Zahid Hussain, an award-winning Pakistani journalist and writer currently serving as the Wilson Center’s Pakistan Scholar, will address these and related questions in a discussion about one of the world’s most fraught bilateral relationships.

This event is organized by the Wilson Center’s Asia Program, and co-sponsored with the Middle East Program and International Security Studies.

Location:
5th Floor, Woodrow Wilson Center

Event Speakers List:
  • Zahid Hussain//

    Pakistan Scholar
    Pakistan Correspondent for The Wall Street Journal and The Times of London.

5.  The Transformation of Political Islam in The Arab Awakening:  Who Are the Major Players? Rayburn, 9:30 am April 11

The Middle East Policy Council invites you and your colleagues to our 68th Capitol Hill Conference. Live streaming of this event will begin at approximately 9:30am EST on Wednesday, April 11th and conclude around noon. A questions and answers session will be held at the end of the proceedings. Refreshments will be served.

April 11, 2011. 9:30am – Noon
Rayburn House Office Building, Gold Room (Room 2168)
RSVP Acceptances only: (202) 296-6767 or info@mepc.org

Speakers:  

John O. Voll

Professor, Georgetown; Associate Director, Prince Alwaleed bin Talal Center for
Muslim-Christian Understanding

Steven Kull

Director, Program on International Policy Attitudes; Senior Research Scholar, University of Maryland

Alexis Arieff

Analyst, Congressional Research Service

Peter Mandaville

Director, Ali Vural Ak Center for Global Islamic Studies, George Mason University


Moderator:

Thomas R. Mattair

Executive Director, Middle East Policy Council

6. The Regional Implications of Shia-Sunni Sectarian Conflict In Middle East and South Asia, Georgetown University, 12:30 pm April 11

and

invite you to:

“The Regional Implications of Shia-Sunni Sectarian Conflict In Middle East and South Asia”

________________________

featuring

Vali Nasr

_______________________________________________

Wednesday, April 11, 2012

12:30pm – ICC 270

_______________________________________________

Over the past decade sectarianism has emerged as a major fault line in Middle east politics. Tensions between Shias and Sunnis have found new meaning in light of the Arab uprisings of the past year to define regional rivalries from the Levant to the Persian Gulf. The conflict in Syria, tensions in Bahrain, Lebanon and Yemen, simmering violence in Iraq and the larger regional rivalry between Iran and Saudi Arabia all tell of the growing importance of the sectarian divide.



Vali Nasr is Professor of International Politics at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy of Tufts University, Senior Fellow at Foreign Policy at Brookings Institution, and a columnist at Bloomberg View. He served as Senior Advisor to U.S. Special Representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan, Ambassador Richard Holbrooke between 2009 and 2011. He is the author of Forces of Fortune: The Rise of a New Middle Class and How it Will Change Our World (Free Press, 2009); The Shia Revival: How Conflicts within Islam will Shape the Future (W.W. Norton, 2006); and Democracy in Iran: History and the Quest for Liberty (Oxford University Press, 2006); as well as a number of other books and numerous articles in academic journals and encyclopedias. He is a Carnegie Scholar for 2006. He written for New York Times, Foreign Affairs, Financial Times, Wall Street Journal,and The Washington Post, and has provided frequent expert commentary to media including CNN, National Public Radio, Newshour, Charlie Rose Show, Meet the Press, the Daily Show with Jon Stewart, The Colbert Report. He received his BA from Tufts University in International Relations, MALD from the Fletcher School of Law in and Diplomacy, and his PhD from MIT in political science in 1991.

 


Seating is limited.

Lunch will be served.

For directions to the Center and information on parking, please visit: http://acmcu.georgetown.edu/about/contact/

7. Global Security Forum 2012: Toward 2014: Afghanistan, Pakistan, and the U.S. Role in the Region, CSIS, 11-12:15 April 11

The Global Security Forum 2012 is a forum on the top challenges facing U.S. and global security. In the coming years, U.S. Special Operations Forces are poised to take on new responsibilities and missions as they transition into a role as a truly “global force.” The panel will discuss the implications of this shift, the future of SOF, and proposed changes to the governing structure of these elite forces.

Toward 2014: Afghanistan, Pakistan, and the U.S. Role in the Region

Anthony H. Cordesman,
Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy, CSIS

Kori Schake,
Research Fellow, Hoover Institution, Stanford University

Amb. Ronald E. Neumann,
Former U.S. Ambassador to Afghanistan

Moderator:
Robert Lamb,

Senior fellow and director of the Program on Crisis, Conflict, and Cooperation at CSIS

8.  Azeris of Iran: Their Condition, Status and Future Prospects, SAIS, 5:30-7 pm April 11

Hosted By: Central Asia Caucasus Institute (CACI)
Location: Rome Building Auditorium, The Rome Building
Summary: Shapoor Ansari, a cardiac surgeon in San Francisco who has worked in both medical and cultural spheres in Azerbaijan, and Huseyn Panahov, the first cadet from Azerbaijan to attend the United States Military Academy at West Point, will discuss this topic. For more information and to RSVP,contact sasicaciforums@jhu.edu.
9.  U.S.-Iraq Relations after the Withdrawal, MEI, 12-1:30 April 13

Location:

1800 Massachusetts Ave., NW
Washington
District of Columbia
20 036

The Middle East Institute is proud to host Amb. Jeffrey Feltman, Amb. Feisal Istrabadi, and Daniel Serwer for a discussion about the state of U.S.-Iraqi relations in the wake of the U.S. troop withdrawal from Iraq in December 2011. Panelists will explore both the challenges and opportunities presented by the transition of the U.S.-Iraqi partnership from a mainly military to a diplomatic one. What sort of working relationship is emerging between the U.S. and Iraqi governments? What kind of cooperation is taking place in the areas of domestic and regional security, diplomacy, trade, energy, and reform? How has the troop drawdown affected U.S. influence in Iraq and the region in general? Feltman, Istrabadi and Serwer will explore strategies and policies resulting from the new bilateral dynamics.

Bios:  Ambassador Jeffrey Feltman has served as assistant secretary of state for Near Eastern Affairs since 2009. A career member of the Foreign Service since 1986, Ambassador Feltman served as principal deputy assistant secretary in the Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs from February 2008 to his present assignment, serving concurrently as acting assistant secretary of state for the Bureau since December 18, 2008. From July 2004 to January 2008, Ambassador Feltman served as the U.S. ambassador to the Republic of Lebanon. Prior to his assignment in Lebanon he headed the Coalition Provisional Authority’s office in the Irbil province of Iraq, serving simultaneously as deputy regional coordinator for the CPA’s northern area. From 2001 until 2003, Ambassador Feltman served at the U.S. consulate-general in Jerusalem, first as deputy principal officer and then as acting principal officer. Other postings include Tunisia and Israel.

Ambassador Feisal Istrabadi served as deputy permanent representative for Iraq at the United Nations from 2004 to 2007. He is currently the founding director of the Center for the Study of the Middle East at Indiana University-Bloomington where he is also University Scholar in International Law and Diplomacy. Prior to his diplomatic appointment, Ambassador Istrabadi served as a legal adviser to the Iraqi Minister for Foreign Affairs during the negotiations for United Nations Security Council resolution 1546 of June 8, 2004, which recognized Iraq’s reassertion of its sovereignty. He was also principal legal drafter of Iraq’s interim constitution, the Law of Administration of the State of Iraq for the Transitional Period, and principal author of its Bill of Fundamental Rights. Before contributing to the reconstruction of Iraq,  Amb. Istrabadi was a practicing trial lawyer in the United States for 15 years.

Daniel Serwer is a scholar at the Middle East Institute as well as a senior research professor of conflict management and a senior fellow at the Center for Transatlantic Relations at the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies. Formerly vice president for Centers of Peacebuilding Innovation at the United States Institute of Peace (2009-10), he led teams there working on rule of law, religion, economics, media, technology, security sector governance, and gender.  He was also vice president for peace and stability operations at USIP (1998-2009), where he led its peacebuilding work in Iraq, Afghanistan, Sudan and the Balkans. Serwer has worked on preventing inter-ethnic and sectarian conflict in Iraq and has facilitated dialogue between Serbs and Albanians in the Balkans. In 2006, he served as executive director of the Hamilton/Baker Iraq Study Group.

Moderator: Charles Dunne is the director for Middle East and North Africa Programs at Freedom House and a scholar at the Middle East Institute. He spent 24 years as a diplomat in the U.S. Foreign Service, serving overseas in Cairo, Jerusalem, and Madras, India.  In addition, he was director for Iraq at the National Security Council from 2005-2007 and a foreign policy adviser to the director for Strategic Plans and Policy at the Joint Staff in the Pentagon (2007-2008).

Tags : , , , , , ,

Peace picks this week

The big event is Carnegie’s with Islamists on Thursday, but the week somehow starts on Wednesday with an event of my very own, he said unashamedly:

1.  Does an Asterisk Make a Difference? SAIS Rome auditorium, 10-11:30 April 4

Belgrade and Pristina–after sustained U.S. and EU pressure–have agreed that Kosovo will be identified with an asterisk in European regional meetings.  The asterisk will make reference to both UN Security Council resolution 1244 and the International Court of Justice advisory opinion on the legality of Kosovo’s declaration of independence.

The asterisk deal is causing second guessing on both sides.  What does it tell us, or not, about Kosovo’s status?  How does it affect the relationship between Pristina and Belgrade?  What implications does it have for U.S. and EU approaches to conflict management?

Wednesday, April 4, 2012
10:00-11:30 a.m.

Rome Auditorium
1619 Massachusetts Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20036

Moderator:
Michael Haltzel
Senior Fellow, Center for Transatlantic Relations

Speakers:
David Kanin
Adjunct Professor of European Studies

Daniel Serwer
Senior Fellow, Center for Transatlantic Relations
Professor of Conflict Management

2. Delegation of Egypt’s Freedom & Justice Party, Georgetown University, 12:30 April 4

Event Details

**Please note venue: Lohrfink Auditorium**

 

A Discussion with

Official Delegation of Egypt’s Freedom & Justice Party (FJP)

Wednesday, April 4 -12:30pm

Lohrfink Auditorium
Rafik B. Hariri Building (2nd floor)

Georgetown University


Panelists:

AbdulMawgoud Dardery 
Member of Parliament, Freedom and Justice Party – Luxor
Member, 
Foreign Relations Committee, Freedom and Justice Party  
Hussein El-Kazzaz
Businessman
Advisor, Muslim Brotherhood and Freedom and Justice Party
Sondos Asem 
Senior Editor, Ikhwanweb.com
Member, Foreign Relations Committee, Freedom and Justice Party  

Khaled Al-Qazzaz
Foreign Relations Coordinator, Freedom and Justice Party

Chair:

John L. Esposito 
University Professor & Founding Director, Alwaleed Bin Talal Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding


For a map showing the location of the Rafik B. Hariri Building, please visit:
http://maps.georgetown.edu/rafikbhariribuilding/

For more information, please visit:
http://acmcu.georgetown.edu

3. Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty CATO 4 pm April 4

Wednesday, April 4, 2012
4:00 PM (Reception To Follow)

Featuring the coauthor Daron Acemoglu, Killian Professor of Economics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; with comments by Karla Hoff, Senior Research Economist, Development Economics Group, World Bank; moderated by Ian Vasquez, Director, Center for Global Liberty and Prosperity, Cato Institute.

The Cato Institute
1000 Massachusetts Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001

Add event to Google CalendarAdd event to Microsoft Outlook CalendarAdd event to iCalAdd event to Yahoo Calendar

If you can’t make it to the Cato Institute, watch this event live online at www.cato.org.


Purchase Book

Institutions — not geography, culture, or other factors — explain why some nations succeed and others fail. So says Daron Acemoglu in an ambitious new book drawing evidence from thousands of years of human history and from societies as diverse as those of the Inca Empire, 17th century England, and contemporary Botswana. Inclusive political and economic institutions, influenced by critical junctures in history, produce virtuous cycles that reinforce pluralism in the market and in politics. Acemoglu will contrast that pattern of development with that experienced under extractive institutions. He will also describe the conditions under which institutions favorable or inimical to development tend to arise. Karla Hoff will provide critical comments.

4. Islamists in Power: Views from Within, Carnegie but at the Grand Hyatt

Thursday, April 5, 2012 – Washington, D.C.
8:45 AM – 4:45 PM EST

Islamist parties have emerged as the strongest contenders in recent elections in Tunisia, Egypt, and Morocco, and are likely continue to do well in future elections in other countries. It is clear that Islamist parties will have a dominant impact on the outcome of Arab transitions, but there is little understanding in Washington of what that will mean for governing.

On April 5, high-level representatives of Islamist parties from Egypt, Tunisia, Morocco, Jordan, and Libya will participate in a one-day event convened by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

Agenda

8:45-9:00 a.m. Opening RemarksJessica Mathews, President
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
9:00-10:45 a.m. Building New Regimes after the UprisingsModerator
Marwan MuasherPanelists
Mustapha Elkhalfi (Morocco)
Abdul Mawgoud Rageh Dardery (Egypt)
Nabil Alkofahi (Jordan)
Sahbi Atig (Tunisia)
11:15 a.m.-1:00 p.m. Writing a New ConstitutionModerator
Nathan BrownPanelists
Khaled Al-Qazzaz (Egypt)
Osama Al Saghir (Tunisia)
Mohamed Gaair (Libya)
1:00-2:30 p.m. Recess
2:30-4:30 p.m. Economic Challenges of the TransitionModerator
Masood AhmedPanelists
Hussein Elkazzaz (Egypt)
Mondher Ben Ayed (Tunisia)
Nael Al-Masalha (Jordan)
Abdelhadi Falahat (Jordan)—not yet confirmed
4:30-4:45 p.m. Closing Remarks

5.  What is in and what is not in the much-disputed newest constitution in Europe:  the Fundamental Law of Hungary, National Press club, 4 pm April 5

Jozsef Szajer

April 5, 2012 4:00 PM

Location: Zenger Room

National Press Club “AFTERNOON NEWSMAKER”
News Conference
Thursday, April 5, 2012, 4 p.m.
National Press Club (Zenger Room)

Member of the European Parliament (MEP) and Author of the new Hungarian Constitution,
JOZSEF SZAJER

Contacts: National Press Club: PETER HICKMAN, 301/530-1210 (H&O/T&F), 301/367-7711 (C), 202/662-7540 (NPC, pjhickman@hotmail.com
Mr. Szajer: Andras Szorenyi (Embassy of Hungary), 202/415-3653 (t), Andras.Szorenyi@mfa.gov.hu

For More Information On This Event,
Please Contact:

Peter Hickman

301-530-1210

pjhickman@hotmail.com

6. The Afghanistan Security Transition: the Role and Importance of Afghanistan’s Neighbors, USIP, 10-12 April 6

Webcast: This event will be webcast live beginning at 10:00am on April 6, 2012 at www.usip.org/webcast.

As the 2014 security transition in Afghanistan approaches, multiple tracks need to be pursued to ensure sustainable peace in the country. A regional solution is often touted as a critical element in achieving such a peace. Without collaborative buy-in for such a solution, however, the potential increases that Afghanistan’s neighbors will play a destabilizing role in the country given their own domestic and international objectives. Despite much debate on this issue, the core interests policies, and views of Afghanistan’s neighboring states are still not well understood.

Join USIP to discuss how Afghanistan’s immediate neighbors – Pakistan, Iran, and the bordering Central Asian Republics – view the present situation and impending transition in Afghanistan, and what their role and policies are likely to be between now and 2014, and beyond. What measures can the U.S. and other allies take to incentivize policies of cooperation and collaboration from these neighbors with the ultimate objective of promoting stability in Afghanistan? USIP works on the ground in Afghanistan and Pakistan to promote the nonviolent resolution of conflicts and build local capacity to prevent and address disputes through nonviolent means.

This event will feature the following speakers:

  • Abubakar Siddique, panelist
    Senior News Correspondent
    Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty
  • Shahrbanou Tadjbakhsh, panelist
    Associate Researcher, Peace Research Institute Oslo
    Professor MPA/Sciences Po (Paris)
  • Alireza Nader, panelist
    Senior International Policy Analyst
    RAND Corporation
  • Moeed Yusuf, moderator
    South Asia Adviser
    United States Institute of Peace

7.  Global Nuclear Security and Preventing Nuclear Terrorism, National Press Club, 10 am April 6

Location: Zenger Room

Panel to Discuss Global Nuclear Security and Preventing Nuclear Terrorism

Date and Time: April 6 at 10 a.m.
Place: Zenger Room, National Press Club, 529 14th St. NW, 13th floor

With the nuclear ambitions of North Korea and Iran a concern of many world leaders, particularly those in the United States and Israel, a panel of foreign policy practitioners will speak at a Press Club Newsmaker on global nuclear security and ways to prevent nuclear terrorism.

Panel participants will be:

• Robert Gallucci, president of the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation and former chief U.S. negotiator during the North Korean nuclear crisis of 1994
• Sharon Squassoni, director and senior fellow, Proliferation Prevention Program, Center for Strategic and International Studies
• Joseph Cirincione, president, Ploughshares Fund
• Alexander Glaser, assistant professor, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University

Contact Info: Keith Hill (khill@bna.com)

Tags : , , , , , , ,

The joke is on us

The temptation to do an April Fool’s post is great, but the barriers are greater:  how can anyone joke about Bashar al Assad murdering Syria’s citizens and managing nevertheless to stay in power?  Or about nuclear weapons in the hands of the Iranian theocracy?  A war we are losing in Afghanistan?  A peace we are losing in Iraq?  A re-assertive Russia determined to marginalize dissent?  An indebted America dependent on a creditor China that requires 7-8% annual economic growth just to avoid massive social unrest?  I suppose the Onion will manage, but I’m not even one of its outer layers.

Not that the world is more threatening than in the past.  To the contrary.  America today faces less threatening risks than it has at many times in the past.  But there are a lot of them, and they are frighteningly varied.  Drugs from Latin America, North Korean sales of nuclear and missile technology, Al Qaeda wherever, Pakistan’s nuclear weapons in the wrong hands, bird or swine flu…  Wonks are competing to offer a single “grand strategy” in a situation that does not permit one.  Doctrine deprived Obama has got it right:  no “strategic vision” can deal with all these contingencies.  They require a case by case approach, albeit one rooted in strength and guided by clear principles.

American military strength is uncontested in today’s world and unequaled for a couple of decades more, even in the most draconian of budget situations.  A stronger economy is on the way, though uncertainty in Europe and China could derail it.  All America’s problems would look easier to solve with a year or two, maybe even three, of 3-4% economic growth.  The principles are the usual ones, which I would articulate this way:

  • The first priority is to protect American national security
  • Do it with cheaper civilian means as much as possible, more expensive military means when necessary
  • Leverage the contributions of others when we can, act unilaterally when we must
  • Build an international system that is legitimate, fair and just
  • Cultivate friends, deter and when necessary defeat enemies

My students will immediately try to classify these proposition as “realist” or “idealist.”  I hope I’ve formulated them in ways that make that impossible.

There are a lot of difficult issues lying in the interstices of these propositions.  Is an international system that gives the victors in a war now more than 65 years in the past vetoes over UN Security Council action fair and just?  Does it lead to fair and just outcomes?  Civilian means seem to have failed in Syria, and seem to be failing with Iran, but are military means any more likely to succeed?  If the threats to American national security are indirect but nonetheless real–when for example North Korea threatens a missile launch intended to intimidate Japan and South Korea–do we withhold humanitarian assistance?

America’s political system likes clear and unequivocal answers.  It has categories into which it would like to toss each of us.  Our elections revolve around identity politics almost as much as those in the Balkans.  We create apparently self-evident myths about our leaders that don’t stand up to scrutiny.

The fact is that the world is complicated, the choices difficult, the categories irrelevant and the myths fantasies.  That’s the joke:  it’s on us.

 

Tags : , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Missive offense and defense

America’s patriots were hard at work this week, not attacking the nation’s enemies but each other.  First the Romney brigade launched a missive, apparently the first salvo in a planned barrage.  The Obama missive defense went ballistic.  The question is this:  how much difference is there, really, between the two presumed candidates?

On one issue, defense spending, there is a clear and present difference:  Obama is in the midst of cutting close to half a billion dollars from projected increases in the Pentagon budget over the next ten years.  Romney says he would not do that (without explaining how he would avoid it).  He has committed himself to a naval buildup, apparently in anticipation of a Chinese challenge that will be decades in the making.  Presumably to cover the interim, he has declared Russia America’s main foreign threat.  Obama is already moving to shore up America’s presence in Asia and the Pacific, but he shows much less concern about Russia and more about Iran.

Romney has said Iran will not get a nuclear weapon if he is elected president.  Obama says Iran will not get a nuclear weapon while he is president.  Romney is clearly thinking more about military threat that enables diplomacy and Obama more about diplomacy enabled by military pressure.  That’s a distinction with a difference in emphasis.

Both candidates are Israel‘s best friend.  Obama has its back.  Romney has its front.  Neither is willing to pressure his best friend to reach a final status agreement with the Palestinians. Romney seems inclined to ignore their existence.  Obama does not but has reached a dead-end on the issue.

Both candidates are also Castro’s worst enemy.  Romney would pursue a tougher isolation policy with Cuba, one that has failed for more than 50 years to bring results.  Obama would try to undermine the Castro regime with soft power, a more recent approach that has also failed to work.

On Iraq and Afghanistan, there are again some real differences.  Romney says it was a mistake for Obama to withdraw all U.S. forces from Iraq.  Obama asks how they could stay if Iraq did not want them and refused to allow immunity from prosecution.  Romney says the drawdown in Afghanistan is too fast.  Obama leans toward accelerating it.  That difference too is real:  Romney would stay in Afghanistan to win, Obama wants to get out before we lose.

Then there are the issues that have not yet been launched.  Romney will likely say Obama hasn’t done enough to support the rebellion in Syria.  Obama won’t say it, but he hesitates on Syria because he wants to keep his powder dry and needs Russian support on Iran.  Obama will vaunt his accomplishments against Al Qaeda.  Romney will criticize Obama for failing to bring around Pakistan.

There are also the intangibles.  Romney says the United States needs to be number 1 and lead.  Obama says the United States needs to collaborate with others and share burdens.  Romney says he would never apologize for the United States.  Obama apologizes when we are responsible for something going terribly wrong.  Romney will say Obama is too soft.  Obama will say Romney is too simplistic.

There are some who think this kind of missive exchange is clarifying or otherwise edifying.  I’m not so sure, even if I think my team–that’s the Obamites–got the best of it on this occasion.  I guess I am nostalgic, but it would be nice to return to the “water’s edge”:  that’s a foreign policy that ignores partisan differences once we leave the east and west coasts to go abroad.  We shouldn’t hide the real differences, but there is more similarity here than either side would like to admit.  Nor will they do so any time before November.

 

Tags : , , , , , , , , ,

The long shadow of European shoppers

If there is one thing I’ve learned in Rome over the past week, it’s that this morning’s headlines are correct:  the Euro zone is headed for more trouble.  While Rome’s streets are crowded and people are eating their fill, the cashiers are idle and the shopping bags empty.

That’s because of two factors:  taxes and uncertainty.  Prime Minister Mario Monti moved quickly once Silvio Berlusconi was out of the way to raise taxes and cut government expenditures.  The big tax hit comes at the end of June, when real estate taxes have to be paid.  People I am talking with claim they will double, but just as important is the uncertainty.  The complicated way they are calculated, and their different application in different localities, means that no one really knows yet how much they are going to have to pay.  The natural reaction is to cut back on expenditures until you are sure you can pay the piper.

Contrary to their image, Italians are big savers.  The savings rate has dipped to around 11 per cent recently, a high level compared to the U.S.  A lot of those savings have been plowed into real estate, which Italians generally buy mostly with cash.  It is common for people to own three or four abodes–a house they live in, one in the country, and one or two rented out until the kids are old enough to occupy them.  I don’t imagine it will be long before the costs of carrying all this real estate motivate a lot of Italians to sell, creating a bear market in real estate that hasn’t been seen since World War II.  Buyers will be few:  mortgage rates are rising in Europe, not low and sometimes falling as in the U.S.

The Italian government is trying to promote more growth, largely by loosening up what has been an extraordinarily rigid labor market:  Italian firms don’t hire readily because they can’t fire readily, or at all.  But there is still a lot of negotiating to do before the system begins to yield. And there is a serious risk of a two-tier labor market, with older workers holding on forever while younger ones never really get onto the first rung of the ladder.

In the meanwhile, Italian industry is losing competitiveness fast.  A stop in Deruta earlier this week suggested that the ceramics business is beyond rescue.  Dozens of firms have closed and the remaining ones have prohibitively high labor costs.  No one but the very rich is going to be able to afford the hand-decorated plates my wife and I bought 40 years ago.

Official projections for this year have the Italian economy shrinking one per cent.  That looks likely to be over-optimistic.  With the Euro still strong–easily 25% higher than its purchasing power parity with the dollar–I’d bet on a lot deeper recession than that.

This will have a serious impact beyond Europe’s borders.  First, in my beloved Balkans:  it is hard to find anyone here interested in seeing even Serbia become a European Union member.  Second, in the Arab uprising countries.  Libya is important to the Italians.  They are pleased that oil and gas exports are rebounding.  But Syria is ignored here.  In a week of lots of conversation with internationally-minded Italians, no one has mentioned it before I did.

But most importantly:  a big European recession could affect the recovery in the United States, crimping growth and increasing risks of another relapse, if not into recession then into very slow growth.  Barack Obama’s reelection prospects depend on at least moderate growth continuing in the U.S.  Republicans who see Barack Obama as a European socialist will think it only just if a recession in overly-regulated Europe leads to his defeat.

It is still far too early to count either Obama or the Europeans out. Even with empty shopping bags, the Italians are still living well and enjoying life.  Barack Obama has a difficult seven months ahead:  the Iran nuclear issue is likely to come to a head during that time, and he’ll have some tough choices to make on how fast to withdraw from Afghanistan and whether to intervene in Syria as well.  But the presidency is still the best place to be running for president from.  The consequences of a European recession will dim his prospects, but not rule him out.

Lots of people, less buying
Tags : , , , ,
Tweet