Tag: Germany
Stevenson’s army, October 5
– Two civ-mil analysts use cases to explain why civilians defer to military advice.-
– Foreign policy analysts warn against declaring Russia a terrorist supporting state.
– A retired colonel says our 4 star officers need replacement.
– A retired Marine colonel says cable news shows should be banned on military bases.
-A Carnegie analyst says bad relations between Germany and Poland are hurting Ukraine.
– BBC notes criticism of Russian military by Russians.
– WSJ says Russia is using Iranian drones very effectively.
– Fred Kaplan says Musk’s “peace plan” won’t work now.
Then Charlie added:
Why wait? These are interesting.
US & Europe are trying to get an anti-Russia vote in the UN General Assembly.
Erdogan might be getting ready for war with Greece.
FP says US is cracking down on Paraguay.
CRS says NDAA may contain provisions on cyber personnel.
National Security Archive touts its document file on Cuban missile crisis.
And I was wrong in class about PAYGO. It’s still on the books, has been routinely cancelled each year, but this fall faces a $100 billion automatic sequester unless Congress agrees to cancel it again.
My SAIS colleague Charlie Stevenson distributes this almost daily news digest of foreign/defense/national security policy to “Stevenson’s army” via Googlegroups. I republish here. To get Stevenson’s army by email, send a blank email (no subject or text in the body) to stevensons-army+subscribe@googlegroups.com. You’ll get an email confirming your join request. Click “Join This Group” and follow the instructions to join. Once you have joined, you can adjust your email delivery preferences (if you want every email or a digest of the emails).
Share this, I'll really appreciate it:
Ukraine can be proud but not happy
Tomorrow will mark six months since Russia invaded Ukraine as well as Ukrainian independence day. The Ukrainians have a lot to be proud of. They have so far foiled Russian President Putin’s effort to deny the former Soviet republic its sovereignty. Realism should temper that pride. Russia has succeeded in taking control of Ukraine’s east and part of its south.
Territorial integrity compromised
The Russians have expanded, marginally but significantly, their control in Donbas. They have essentially taken all of Luhansk and threaten the part of Donetsk that remains in Ukrainian control. The Russians have also established their much-desired land bridge to Crimea through Mariupol and pressed northwest to take Kherson as well as threaten Mikolaiv and Odesa. Ukraine without the territory Russia now occupies would be a rump of its former self and face constant threats from its north (via Belarus), east, and south.
It isn’t over
So the war is far from over, despite the successful defense of Kiev and Kharkiv as well as the enormous losses inflicted on the demoralized and disorganized Russian army, air force, and navy. The Ukrainians lack the manpower to conduct a conventional offense but are using their supplies of NATO-origin artillery, drones, anti-tank missiles, and other weapons to batter the Russians and their supply lines.
Winter is coming. The Ukrainians will try to win before winter if the opportunity for a successful offensive presents itself. But by now the Russians are dug in and presumably understand their own weaknesses as well as the Ukrainians’ strengths. Only a sudden collapse of the Russian army would likely give the Ukrainians the opportunity they want.
The Russians also know Ukraine’s weaknesses
The Ukrainian will to fight may still be strong, but NATO solidarity has been waning. The US has been pumping in weapons and ammunition, but Europe is lagging:
Winter, when the Russians will no doubt cut off European antagonists’ gas supplies, will be hard for Germany in particular. The Germans have cut their dependency on Russia dramatically. They are also building gas stocks and may keep operating three nuclear plants beyond their scheduled closure at the end of this year. But that may not be enough to meet the country’s needs. Putin is banking on making life hard for Chancellor Scholz.
Prospects for negotiations are dim
The current situation looks like a mutually hurting stalemate, which is a condition for successful negotiations. But there is a second condition: a way out. Neither President Zelensky nor President Putin sees a way of ending the war with anything like the current territorial control. For Zelensky, it would be a plain defeat. Putin might be able to sell it at home, not least because he has little opposition and full control of the media. But his real aim is to end Ukraine as a separate state and incorporate it into the Russian Federation, as it was once a republic within the Soviet Union. Zelensky is captive of his country’s aspirations. Putin is captive of his own ambition.
Kiev and Moscow did manage to come to agreement on safe passage for Ukrainian grain exports. That agreement seems to be working so far, but it won’t have a big impact on world grain supplies. For Putin the main purpose is to keep the Africa and the Middle East from abandoning their relative neutrality and going over to the West. The revenue is useful to Ukraine, mainly to keep its farmers from throwing in their lot with the Russian occupiers.
Expanding the scope of negotiations beyond grain exports will be difficult. Even normal humanitarian exchanges of civilians and prisoners of war don’t appear to be happening. The Russians are shipping unwilling Ukrainians to Russia, de-populating the territory Moscow plans to keep. How they will repopulate it is anyone’s guess. There is no excess of people in Russia. Ukraine may be more attractive than Siberia, but the low population density in the latter is already a big problem for Russia.
The best that can be said
The Ukraine war has displaced at least 14 million people, half of whom have fled abroad, while another 13 million are estimated to be trapped in unsafe areas. That makes well over half of Ukraine’s pre-war population of over 44 million. The humanitarian response has been strong, but how long it will last is another question. The number of casualties is unclear, but is certainly in multiple tens of thousands on both sides.
The best that can be said is that Europe has awakened to the threat from Russia. The Baltic states and Poland are especially keen on a Russian defeat in Ukraine, because otherwise they might be next. Germany has also seen the threat. Sweden and Finland have abandoned neutrality and are joining NATO, if Turkey allows. The softer parts of Europe include Hungary, which already has a filo-Russian government, and Italy, which may get one after its election September 25. France and Turkey have at times seemed to waiver, but more in the interest of serving as mediators than actually supporting Russia.
The Ukrainians are going to need more of the courage they have already demonstrated. The U.S. and Europe need to keep them well-supplied. Proud Ukraine is not a happy Ukraine. This war is from over.
Slava Ukraini!
Share this, I'll really appreciate it:
Stevenson’s army, June 20
On this new federal holiday, commemorating the announcement of the end of slavery in Texas in 1865, WaPo has one of its historical stories [Retropolis] noting that, just before Lincoln’s inauguration, Congress passed a Constitutional amendment guaranteeing the continuation of slavery in states where it existed. Lincoln supported the amendment as a way of preventing civil war. It was not ratified by enough states, but author Ben Winter wrote an intriguing novel [Underground Airlines] assuming we still had slavery in four states today.
– Germany is restarting its coal-fired plants to cope with Russian cuts in energy.
– Task & Purpose says USAF should re-think, given the Ukraine war.
My SAIS colleague Charlie Stevenson distributes this almost daily news digest of foreign/defense/national security policy to “Stevenson’s army” via Googlegroups. I republish here. To get Stevenson’s army by email, send a blank email (no subject or text in the body) to stevensons-army+subscribe@googlegroups.com. You’ll get an email confirming your join request. Click “Join This Group” and follow the instructions to join. Once you have joined, you can adjust your email delivery preferences (if you want every email or a digest of the emails).
Share this, I'll really appreciate it:
Prospects for real peace in Syria: not good
The sixth pledging Conference for the Future of Syria and the Region met in Brussels yesterday and today. On the margins, Baytna, a Syrian organization committed to empowering civil society, hosted a discussion (Peace in Syria: possibility or fantasy?) assessing the prospects for a real, sustainable peace. Not good, in two words.
Justice and accountability
The UN Commission of Inquiry and its Independent, Impartial and Independent Mechanism (IMMM) as well as the use of universal jurisdiction to prosecute war criminals in Germany are important tools. But they have not produced substantial results. Only a few political prisoners have been freed, out of well over 100,000. So far the accused are a few small fry. There will be a great deal more to do once the opportunity arises.
A political transition is vital. Justice goes beyond accountability, especially for women. A broader framework of rule of law and security is needed.
Failure to hold people accountable in Syria has encouraged Russian abuses in Ukraine. Impunity for Bashar al Asad has taught others that they can escape accountability.
The economy
The situation today is disastrous. The overwhelming majority of Syrians are poor and in need of assistance. That is partly due to international sanctions. Once real peace arrives, a strong central authority will still be needed to manage the economy. When the time comes for lifting of sanctions, the international community needs a plan to do it expeditiously. [I missed some of the presentation on the economy, so apologies for that].
Rights and government
Syria needs radical political decentralization. The constitution should limit the powers of the presidency. Elected local authorities should control education and some taxation authority. The government needs to respect the social, cultural, and political rights of minorities. We can learn from the recent constitution in Tunisia, which instituted decentralization as a principle of the state. The existing provisions for decentralization in Syria are not adequate.
Social cohesion and peacebuilding
Local actors are key. They have a deep understanding of how things really work at the community level. We need to understand their political and social agendas and respond to their context and priorities. Funding should be flexible and accessible, aimed at strengthening civil society organizations that set their own priorities, regardless of who the local authorities are. We should not create or impose risks on Syrians trying to meet local community needs.
On the pathway to peace, an audience member suggested Syrian representation is an issue. It is not enough just to exclude those “who have blood on their hands.” Inclusiveness has hampered negotiations. The course of the war in Ukraine suggests helping Syrians to defend themselves might help. Only the Syrian people will be able to remove the regime and rebuild civil society. It’s a long road. We need to invest in people inside Syria who will make a difference.
As my Arabic is miserable, I missed most of the discussion. But the bottom line was clear enough: prospects for real peace in Syria in the short run are not good.
Share this, I'll really appreciate it:
Stevenson’s army, April 7
– Politico report shows many agencies acting on Ukraine.
– WaPo details Biden’s “deliberate but impulsive” response to Ukraine.
– NYT says Russia is bringing in mercenaries with May 9 plan for victory.
– German intelligence reports intercepts of Russians talking of killing civilians.
– WaPo reports on the right-wing Azov Battalion fighting for Ukraine.
– WaPo says India media echo Russia.
– On the other hand, Politico says many lawmakers want permanent sanctions on Putin’s Russia.[My take: Russia can’t be defeated militarily in a conventional war. The fighting can’t end until Russia is willing, either because the costs are too high or it believes it can’t achieve more. Thinking strategically, the pro-Ukraine side needs to provide some relief to Russia if it agrees to a cease-fire. Similarly, a regime-change goal only prolongs the killing of Ukrainians.]
My SAIS colleague Charlie Stevenson distributes this almost daily news digest of foreign/defense/national security policy to “Stevenson’s army” via Googlegroups. I republish here. To get Stevenson’s army by email, send a blank email (no subject or text in the body) to stevensons-army+subscribe@googlegroups.com. You’ll get an email confirming your join request. Click “Join This Group” and follow the instructions to join. Once you have joined, you can adjust your email delivery preferences (if you want every email or a digest of the emails).
Share this, I'll really appreciate it:
Stevenson’s army, March 30
– Institute for Study of War has regular military updates on Ulkraine.
– CRS has new update on US assistance to Ukraine.
– NYT notes that the top 3 German security agencies are now run by women.
– WSJ say Taiwan is drawing lessons from Ukraine.
– Reuters says North Korea missile test may have been deception.
-Kori Schake criticizes new defense budget.
History: National Security Archive has declassified material on the B61 bomb and a false alarm of a nuclear attack.
My SAIS colleague Charlie Stevenson distributes this almost daily news digest of foreign/defense/national security policy to “Stevenson’s army” via Googlegroups. I republish here. To get Stevenson’s army by email, send a blank email (no subject or text in the body) to stevensons-army+subscribe@googlegroups.com. You’ll get an email confirming your join request. Click “Join This Group” and follow the instructions to join. Once you have joined, you can adjust your email delivery preferences (if you want every email or a digest of the emails).
RSS - Posts
