Tag: Turkey

Peace picks May 13-17

1. Exploring Tunisia’s Investment Climate, Monday, May 13 / 11:00am – 12:30pm, Aspen Institute

Venue: Aspen Institute, One Dupont Circle, NW, Suite 700, Washington, D.C. 20036

SPEAKERS: Don De Amicis, Daniela Gressani, Ziad Oueslati, Tom Speechley

Two years after the revolution, Tunisia’’s economy is at a turning point. The new government is struggling to address high levels of continued unemployment, while trying to attract increased international investment. With unemployment at 17% nation-wide and 30% in the interior, Tunisia must create jobs and investment in key sectors such as hospitality, agriculture, energy and technology. Partners for a New Beginning welcomes you to join us for a discussion on the opportunities and challenges to Tunisia’’s economic future. Panelists will explore the role of the international community and local government and private sector in supporting Tunisia’’s economic transition.

Register for the event here:
http://www.aspeninstitute.org/events/2013/05/13/exploring-tunisias-investment-climate

2. Egypt’s Litigious Transition, Monday, May 13 / 12:00pm – 1:30pm , Atlantic Council

Venue: Atlantic Council of the United States, 1101 15th Street, NW, 11th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20005

SPEAKERS: Mahmoud Hamad, Yussef Auf

The judiciary has profoundly shaped Egypt’s transition by prosecuting former regime figures, restructuring government institutions, and reshaping a fluid legal framework. Judges blocked executive orders and dissolved the Islamist dominated parliament, drawing the ire of Islamist forces in power who now view the judiciary as a political enemy. Legal maneuvering, such as President Mohamed Morsi’s replacement of the prosecutor general and the Islamist led Shura Council’s debate over a judicial authority law that would severely curtail judicial influence, has heightened tensions between the judges and the government. What implications does this dynamic hold for the future of Egypt’s transition? Does the judiciary exert a moderating influence over the political process or has hyper-partisanship tainted its objectivity? Please join us for a discussion of these issues with Mahmoud Hamad, author of the new Atlantic Council issue brief, Egypt’s Litigious Transition, and Yussef Auf, a nonresident fellow at the Rafik Hariri Center.

Register for the event here:
http://www.acus.org/event/egypts-litigious-transition

3. Building on Progress in Afghanistan: 2014 and Beyond, Monday, May 13 / 2:00pm – 3:00pm , Center for Strategic and International Studies    

Venue: Center for Strategic and International Studies, 1800 K Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20006
B1 Conference Center

SPEAKERS: Ajay Chhibber

Ajay Chhibber is United Nations Assistant Secretary-General and UNDP Assistant Administrator in UNDP’s Regional Bureau for Asia and the Pacific, managing UNDP programs in 39 countries, including Afghanistan. Representing UNDP’s unique perspective on development in Afghanistan, Mr. Chhibber will discuss the challenges and opportunities for Afghanistan’s development, particularly with the 2014 transition approaching.

Despite obvious shortcomings and many setbacks, Afghanistan has seen significant progress that is often overlooked in discourse on the future of the country. For instance, in just a decade, the number of mobile phones in Afghanistan has increased from zero to over 18 million. Meanwhile, some 3 million girls are attending schools in Afghanistan today-whereas under Taliban rule girls’ education was outlawed.

Please RSVP to PPD@csis.org.

4. Diaspora Engagement: Bridge-Building in Southeast Europe Roundtable, Monday, May 13 / 2:30pm – 6:00pm, United Macedonian Diaspora

Venue: United Macedonian Diaspora, 1510 H Street, NW, Suite 900, Washington, D.C.

SPEAKERS: Ambassador Josko Paro, Ambassador Srdjan Darmanovic, Tyson Barker, Robert Benjamin, Steven Bucci, Robert Hand, Ivana Howard

The Third Annual Southeast Europe Coalition Roundtable is being held in conjunction with the Third Annual U.S. Department of State’s Global Diaspora Forum (GDF).  It is estimated that over five million Americans claim ancestry from Southeast Europe, or what is commonly known as the Balkans.  Keeping in mind with this years GDF theme “Where Ideas Meet Action,” the Southeast Europe Coalition hopes to bring together diplomats, think tank experts, and Diaspora leaders to engage in an open discussion on current trends in the region, as well as how the Diaspora can build bridges among themselves and with U.S. and Southeast Europe stakeholders.

RSVP to:
amilovanovic@umdiaspora.org

5. Conflict Assessment: Comparing Research Methods and Conceptual Frameworks’, Tuesday, May 14 / 9:30am – 11:30am , Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies

Venue: Johns Hopkins SAIS – Nitze Building, 1740 Massachusetts Ave., N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036
Kenney Auditorium

SPEAKERS: Dayna Brown, Neil Levine, Bruce Hemmer, Paul Turner, Lisa Schirch

Dayna Brown, director of the Listening Project at CDA Collaborative Learning; Neil Levine, director of the Office of Conflict Management and Mitigation in USAID’s Office of Democracy and Governance; Bruce Hemmer, a research analyst at the Office of Learning and Training of the U.S. Department of State’s Bureau for Conflict and Stabilization Operations (CSO); Paul Turner, a CSO policy analyst; and Lisa Schirch founding director of the Alliance for Peacebuilding’s 3P Human Security program, will discuss this topic. Note: SAIS will host a live Webcast for this event.

Register for the event here:
http://sais-jhu.edu/events/2013-05-14-093000-2013-05-14-113000/conflict-assessment-comparing-research-methods-and

6. American Foreign Policy in Retreat? A Discussion with Vali Nasr, Tuesday, May 14 / 9:30am – 11:00am, Brookings Institution

Venue: Brookings Institution, 1775 Massachusetts Ave, NW, Washington, D.C. 20036

SPEAKERS: Martin S. Indyk, Vali Nasr, Robert Kagan

For the past decade, a debate has raged about the future of American power and foreign policy engagement. In his new book, The Dispensable Nation: American Foreign Policy in Retreat (Knopf Doubleday Publishing, 2013), Brookings Nonresident Senior Fellow Vali Nasr questions America’s choice to lessen its foreign policy engagement around the world. Nasr argues that after taking office in 2009, the Obama administration let fears of terrorism and political backlash confine its policies to that of the previous administration, instead of seizing the opportunity to fundamentally reshape American foreign policy over the past four years. Meanwhile, China and Russia – rivals to American influence globally – were quietly expanding their influence in places where the U.S. has long held sway. Nasr argues that the Obama administration’s foreign policy decision making could have potentially dangerous outcomes, and, what’s more, sells short America’s power and role in the world.

On May 14, Foreign Policy at Brookings will host Vali Nasr for a discussion on the state of U.S. power globally and whether American foreign policy under the Obama administration is in retreat. Brookings Senior Fellow Robert Kagan will join the discussion, which will be moderated by Vice President Martin Indyk, director of Foreign Policy.

Register for the event here:
http://www.brookings.edu/events/2013/05/14-dispensable-nation-american-foreign-policy?rssid=UpcomingEvents&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+BrookingsRSS%2Ftopfeeds%2FUpcomingEvents+%28Brookings+Upcoming+Events%29

 7. Drone Wars: Counterterrorism and Human Rights, Tuesday, May 14 / 12:15pm – 1:45pm , New America Foundation

Venue: New America Foundation, 1899 L St., N.W., Suite 400, Washington, D.C. 20036

SPEAKERS: Ben Emmerson, Peter Bergen

On March 15, Ben Emmerson, the UN Special Rapporteur on Human Rights and Counterterrorism, released a statement that categorically declared the CIA drone program a “violation of Pakistan’s sovereignty.” That statement followed three days of secret meetings with Pakistani officials, who told Emmerson that they had confirmed 400 civilian deaths in drone strikes since the program began in 2004.

In Pakistan, popular support for CIA drone strikes is virtually non-existent. Although public opinion in favor of drone strikes remains quite high in the United States, the targeted killing campaign has come under increasing fire of late from human rights organizations, Congress, and even former U.S. government officials. The New America Foundation’s National Security Studies Program is pleased to invite you to a conversation with Emmerson about his work investigating human rights violations in the “war on terror,” particularly in relation to the CIA drone program.

Register for the event here:
http://www.newamerica.net/events/2013/drone_wars_human_rights

8. Pakistan’s 2013 Elections: Assessing the Results and Impacts, Tuesday, May 14 / 2:00pm – 3:30pm, US Institute of Peace

Venue: US Institute of Peace, 2301 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, D.C.

SPEAKERS: Safiya Ghori-Ahmad, Arif Rafiq, Moeed Yusuf, Andrew Wilder

Pakistan’s general election scheduled for May 11th, 2013, will mark a further milestone in the country’s democratic development. While previous elected governments in Pakistan have completed their full terms in office, and political power has been peacefully transferred, expectations have been high that the 2013 elections would be the most free and fair ever in Pakistan’s history. This is in part due to the greater independence of the Election Commission of Pakistan, as well as the relatively ‘hands off’ role being played by the Pakistan military and intelligence agencies relative to past elections. However, the dramatic increase this past month in attacks by Islamist militant groups on candidates, political party workers and election offices, primarily targeting political parties viewed as ‘secular’ in the Pakistan contest – in particular the Awami National Party (ANP), the Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM) and the Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) – are now raising serious questions about how free and fair the elections will actually be.

Please join the U.S. Institute of Peace on May 14, 2013 from 2:00pm until 3:30pm, for a panel discussion on the results of Pakistan’s May 11th elections, and the implications of these results for both for Pakistan, as well as U.S.-Pakistan relations. This event will be webcasted live beginning at 2:00pm on May 14.

Register for the event here:
http://www.usip.org/events/pakistans-elections-hopeful-future-or-unstable-one

9. U.S.-Pakistan Security Relations: From 9/11 to 2011, with an Eye on 2014, Tuesday, May 14 / 4:00pm – 5:15pm , Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars

Venue: Woodrow Wilson Center, 1300 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, D.C. 20004

SPEAKERS: Simbal Khan

Soon after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, the United States and Pakistan entered into a wide-ranging security partnership. The deal ushered in an era of volatile relations between Washington and Islamabad. During her time as the Wilson Center’s 2012-13 Pakistan Scholar, Simbal Khan has been researching the U.S.-Pakistan security relationship, and at this event she will highlight her findings. She will also examine what the future may hold for U.S.-Pakistan security ties with the approach of the 2014 international troop withdrawal from Afghanistan.

Register for the event here:
http://www.wilsoncenter.org/event/us-pakistan-security-relations-911-to-2011-eye-2014

10. U.S. Policy Toward Iran, Wednesday, May 15 / 9:30am , U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations

Venue: Dirksen Senate Office Building, Constitution Avenue and 1st Street, NE, Washington, DC
Room 419

SPEAKERS: The Honorable Wendy Sherman, The Honorable David S. Cohen

Register for the event here:
http://www.foreign.senate.gov/hearings/us-policy-toward-iran-05-15-2013

11. Getting to a Two State Solution: A Regional Perspective, Wednesday, May 15 / 10:00am – 11:30am, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars

Venue: Woodrow Wilson Center, 1300 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, D.C. 20004

SPEAKERS: Ghaith Al-Omari, Marwan Muasher, Gilead Sher, Aaron David Miller

Twenty years after the signing of the Oslo Accords, Secretary of State John Kerry,—the latest in a series of U.S. envoys,—is embarked on a serious effort to revive the Israeli-Palestinian peace process. How will recent elections in Israel and the resignation of Prime Minister Fayyad influence his prospects? What about the impact of the Iranian nuclear issue and the civil war in Syria? Join us for a discussion with four regional experts with long experience in government, diplomacy, and national security affairs.

Register for the event here:
http://www.wilsoncenter.org/event/getting-to-two-state-solution-regional-perspective

12. A Postmortem on Pakistan’s 2013 Elections, Wednesday, May 15 / 12:00pm – 1:30pm , Middle East Institute

Venue: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 1779 Massachusetts Ave. NW, Washington, D.C. 20036
Choate Room

SPEAKERS: Arif Rafiq, Shamila Chaudhary, Simbal Khan, Daniel Markey, Marvin G. Weinbaum

In the wake of Pakistan’s recently concluded elections, this panel will offer insight and analysis into what the results are likely to mean for the future of the country and region.  The speakers will reflect on the possible composition of a new government and the implications of the election for the future of Pakistan’s democratic system. In addition to the election’s domestic ramifications, the panelists will also address the possible effects of the elections for the United States and American foreign policy.

Register for the event here:
http://www.mei.edu/events/postmortem-pakistans-2013-elections

 

Tags : , , , , , , , , ,

Syria: is there hope?

Salon.com asked me to review recent events in Syria and their significance.  They published it today under the heading “Has the Syria threat cooled?”: 

Watching Syria is like looking through a kaleidoscope. The picture seems to change dramatically in response to the slightest jolt, but the components remain the same. The past week has seen lots of jolts, but no real change in the elements that make up the sad picture.

Inside Syria, the regime’s forces have started an ethnic cleansing campaign in the west intended to clear Sunnis from areas its Alawite supporters want to secure for themselves. The regime has also successfully pushed south toward the Jordanian border. In much of the rest of the country, there is lots of fighting but only marginal changes in the confrontation lines, which run through many urban areas, or between the urban centers and the countryside. Almost 7 million Syrians are now thought to need humanitarian assistance. The number could rise dramatically during the rest of the year.

Secretary Kerry’s visit to Moscow this week revived, once again, hopes for a negotiated settlement. He and the Russians agreed to try to convene a conference, even before the end of the month, that would include both the Syrian opposition and the Assad regime. The prospect of this conference will relieve President Obama of any need for a quick decision on unilateral action in Syria, since it would hardly be appropriate to preempt the conference. That is likely what both the Russians and the Americans wanted: more time.

Pressure had been building for action, including possible direct American shipment of arms to the opposition, safe areas for displaced people, a no-fly zone, or an attack on Syria’s air force and missiles, which are being used against civilians. Evidence that the regime has used chemical weapons put President Obama on the spot, as he has several times said that crossing this red line would change his calculus. American credibility, some thought, was at stake.

The ink was barely dry on the allegation of chemical weapons use when Carla Del Ponte, a Swiss member of a U.N. human rights inquiry for Libya, suggested that she knew of evidence that chemical weapons were used by the opposition rather than the regime. This allegation has little credibility, not only because of the technical difficulties involved but also because Del Ponte has a record of sensational allegations that are difficult to prove (or disprove).

Syria’s neighbors are increasingly under strain. Turkey, Lebanon and Jordan are over-burdened with refugees, now more than 1.4 million strong and likely to double within the year. In Iraq, the Syrian fighting is exacerbating sectarian tensions between the government in Baghdad and Sunni protesters. Prime Minister Maliki is worried that a successful revolution in Sunni-majority Syria will export insurgency to his Shia-majority Iraq. At least some of the protesters will not be unhappy if he is correct.

Israel struck by air inside Syria twice last weekend, ostensibly to block missiles from trans-shipment to Lebanon’s Hezbollah from Iran. This has cast doubt on the efficacy of Syria’s air defenses, which has been a consideration inhibiting American military action in support of the opposition. Hezbollah is saying Syria will arm it with “game-changing” weapons. If so, we can expect more Israeli attacks to prevent their transfer. At the same time, Israel is at pains to make it clear it is not intervening in the Syrian civil war. It is also strengthening its border defenses against a buildup of radical opposition Islamists in the Golan Heights.

Syria is also causing serious political tensions elsewhere in the Middle East. Turkey and Qatar are supporting Muslim Brotherhood-affiliates inside Syria. Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates dislike the Brotherhood and claim to be supporting secularists, which is what the United States prefers. The Syrian opposition remains fragmented. The Brotherhood-affiliated prime minister has not yet named his government, presumably a vital step before a conference can be held.

None of these developments suggest much hope for a negotiated settlement at an upcoming peace conference. Conferences of this sort went on for years during the Bosnian war, without result until the Americans twisted arms at Dayton. It is not clear whether the Americans and Russians are prepared to twist opposition and regime arms with the vigor required to get a settlement. But Secretary Kerry’s backpedaling from insistence that Bashar al Assad leave office at the start of a transition opens up an area of possible agreement with Moscow that has not been in evidence previously.

It would be foolish, however, to suggest that a negotiated settlement is just around the next corner. We are still at the beginning of Syria’s strife. It would be much safer to assume things will get even worse before they get better. There will be more unexpected jolts and changes in the kaleidoscopic pattern before this is over.

Tags : , , , , , , , , ,

Between Iraq and a hard place

World Politics Review published this piece I did for them on Iraq this morning, under the heading “Politically Exposed, Iraq’s Maliki Cracks Down.”  They asked that I put up on peacefare.net only a few paragraphs, so I am afraid you have to go to their website to read the rest (you should be able to read it without paying): 

While details remain uncertain about who started the fighting and exactly who did what to whom, last week saw a marked escalation in rhetoric and violence between mostly Sunni Arab protesters and Iraqi government forces under Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki’s control. Peaceful protests turned into armed camps. Dozens were killed in the most intense clashes with security forces since Iraq’s virtual civil war in 2006-2007.

The Iraqi state is today much better equipped to hold its own against armed adversaries than it was six or seven years ago, when the U.S. played a crucial role in ending sectarian fighting, not least by negotiating to bring Sunni “Awakening” forces over to the government’s side. Maliki’s approach is less nuanced — his political coalition is not called “State of Law” for nothing. He feels justified using the state’s monopoly on the legitimate means of violence to subdue protesters who take up arms, even as he also promises investigations into any abuses.

The protesters feel equally justified. They view Maliki as increasingly sectarian and authoritarian. Torture is common in Iraq’s prisons. Iraq’s media are under pressure. Maliki has bypassed official processes to appoint personally loyal military commanders and undermined the independence of the central bank, the judiciary, anti-corruption investigators and other countervailing institutions. Several Sunni politicians have been accused of supporting terrorism and their personal security details subjected to arrest, with at least one guard dying in detention under suspicious circumstances…[go here Politically Exposed, Iraq’s Maliki Cracks Down for the rest]

Tags : , , , ,

Peace Picks April 29-May 3

Too many good events in DC this week: 

1. The Media & Iran’s Nuclear Program: An analysis of US and UK coverage, 2009-2012, Monday, April 29 / 9:00am – 10:30am, Woodrow Wilson Center

Venue: Woodrow Wilson Center 1300 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, D.C. 20004 5th Floor Conference Room

Speakers: Jonas Siegel, Saranaz Barforoush, John Steinbruner, Susan Moeller, Reza Marashi, Walter Pincus

How does news coverage of Iran’s nuclear program affect public understanding and policy outcomes? News media traditionally play an important role in communicating about foreign policy is this the case with coverage of Irans nuclear program? How specifically are news media framing the relevant issues? To answer these questions, researchers from the Center for International and Security Studies at Maryland (CISSM) undertook a topical analysis of English-language newspaper coverage from 2009 through 2012, a period in which there was considerable public discussion about how the United States and others could and should resolve the dispute.

Register for the event here:
(http://www.wilsoncenter.org/event/rsvp?eid=27221&pid=112)

2. Iran-Azerbaijan Relations and Strategic Competition in the Caucasus, Monday, April 29 / 9:00am – 11:30am, Center for Strategic and International Studies

Venue: Center for Strategic and International Studies, 1800 K Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20006 Basement Level Conference Rooms A & B

Speakers: Andrew C. Kuchins, Farhad Mammadov, Asim Mollazade, Heydar Mirza, Alex Vatanka, Sergey Markedonov and more

Despite common cultural and religious heritage, relations between Iran and Azerbaijan remain tumultuous. Issues ranging from the status Iran’s ethnic Azeri minority to the frozen conflict in Nagorno-Karabakh to relations with Israel all complicate bilateral ties between Baku and Tehran. Iran-Azerbaijan relations also shape larger geopolitical questions related to the strategic balance in the Caucasus and the role of major regional powers Turkey and Russia. With tensions over Iran’s nuclear program again in the spotlight, the CSIS Russia and Eurasia Program is hosting a discussion about the current dynamics of Iran-Azerbaijan relations and their regional and international implications.

Register for the event here:
(http://csis.org/event/iran-azerbaijan-relations-and-strategic-competition-caucasus)

3. Why the United States Should Err on the Side of Too Many (Not Too Few) Nuclear Weapons, Monday, April 29 / 12:00pm – 1:30pm, Elliott School of International Affairs

Venue: Elliott School of International Affairs, 1957 E Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20052 Lindner Family Commons

Speakers: Matt Kroenig, Assistant Professor of Government, Georgetown University

Enthusiasm for nuclear reductions is driven by three beliefs about arsenal size widely held by experts in Washington: First, a secure, second-strike capability is sufficient for deterrence and nuclear warheads in excess of this requirement can be cut with little loss to our national security. Second, proliferation to rogue states and terrorist networks is a greater threat than nuclear war with great powers, and reductions can advance our nonproliferation objectives in Iran and elsewhere. Third, we have spent hundreds of billions of dollars on nuclear weapons since 1945 and, in a time of budget austerity, reductions will result in cost savings. There is just one problem: all three beliefs are incorrect. A more pragmatic assessment suggests that the United States should not engage in additional nuclear reductions and should instead make the necessary investments to maintain a robust nuclear infrastructure for decades to come.

Register for the event here:
(https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/viewform?formkey=dDYwNmFlbk41QjZlZ1pySHUxNklHZFE6MA#gid=0)

4. Political Islam and the Struggle for Democracy in Egypt, Monday, April 29 / 6:30pm – 8:00pm, Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies

Venue: Johns Hopkins SAIS – Bernstein-Offit Building 1717 Massachusetts Ave., N.W., Washington, D.C. Room 500

Speakers: Michele Dunne, Nathan Brown

During this panel, our participant speakers will discuss the political situation in Egypt two years after the revolution. They will consider the results achieved, met and unmet objectives, and political reforms enacted since the spring of 2010. Furthermore, they will indicate the roles of the Muslim Brotherhood as a ruling party and President Morsi. They will discuss the recent happenings and unrest in Egypt and future scenarios.

RSVP to:
menaclub.sais@gmail.com

5.  The Bread Revolutions of 2011 and the Political Economies of Transition, Tuesday April 30/ 10:00am – 11:30am, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars

Venue: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars-1300 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, D.C. 200046th Floor Flom Auditorium

Speakers: Pete Moore, Holger Albrecht, Haleh Esfandiari

The Middle East Program at the Woodrow Wilson Center and the United States Institute of Peace Present The Bread Revolutions of 2011 and the Political Economies of Transition. During the 2011 uprisings, Arab protestors channeled decades of discontent with failed economic policy. However, the demise of leaders will not be enough to answer this discontent nor ensure productive development. Scholarship on the political determinates of economic development finds that the common recipe of expanding the private sector and increasing trade openness may be valuable, but alone are not sufficient for successful development. The Arab World’s economic path to 2011 included implementation in these areas, yet reform in underlying socio-economic structures and interests lagged. Addressing these conditions constitutes one of the most serious challenges facing Arab economies and politics.

This event will be the fourth in a series of five papers and presentations on “Reshaping the Strategic Culture of the Middle East.

Website: http://www.wilsoncenter.org/event/the…

6. The Imperatives of the Inter-Religious Dialogue in Nigeria, Tuesday April 30/ 2:00pm-3:30pm,  Woodrow Wilson Center for Scholars

Venue: Woodrow Wilson Center, 1300 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, D.C. 20004

Speakers: H.E. Rotimi Chibuike Amaechi, Sa’Adu Abubakar, John Onaiyekan

This dialogue seeks to ascertain the true nature and scope of religious tensions in Nigeria, as well as elaborate possible ways forward.

The Wilson Center’s Africa Program continues to monitor Nigeria’s progress and welcomes the opportunity to hear from a panel of such respected government and religious leaders.

Speakers:

H.E. Rotimi Chibuike Amaechi, Governor of the Rivers State, Nigeria
Sa’adu Abubakar, Sultan of Sokoto and President of the Society for the Victory of Islam
John Onaiyekan, Roman Catholic Cardinal Archbishop of Abuja

Website: http://www.wilsoncenter.org/event/the…

7. Ten Years After Saddam, Tuesday April 30/ 2:00pm-3:00pm, Center for International Media Assistance

Venue: National Endowment for Democracy, 1025 F Street NW, Suite 800, Washington, D.C. 20004

Speakers: Abir Awad, Tim Eaton, Theo Dolan, Shameem Rassam

It is a decade since the U.S.-led coalition troops entered Iraq in March 2003. “The years that have followed have been turbulent for an Iraq riven by divisions and sectarian violence, as elites have battled one another for control,” according to a policy briefing by BBC Media Action, The media of Iraq ten years on: The problems, the progress, the prospects. “It remains a country that is anything but stable and united.” The report, which the panelists will present and discuss, examines one element of Iraq’s journey over the last ten years: that of its media reform. The paper makes the point that while the Iraqi media landscape of 2013 may not be the free, pluralistic, and professional fourth estate that many in the West had envisioned in 2003, it nonetheless has real strengths. Those strengths–as well as weaknesses– reflect the complexity and reality of modern Iraq.

Website: http://cima.ned.org/events/upcoming-e…

8. Future of US Ground Forces Report Roll-out Event, Wednesday May 1 / 9:00am-10:30am, Center for Strategic and International Studies

Venue: Center for Strategic and International Studies, 1800 K Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20006

Speakers: David J. Berteau, Nathan Freier, Barry Pavel, James Dubik, Frank Hoffman

The Center for Strategic and International Studies presents the roll-out event for the report

Beyond the Last War: Balancing Ground Forces and Future Challenges Risk in USCENTCOM and USPACOM with introductory remarks by

David J. Berteau
CSIS Senior Vice President and Director, International Security Program

followed by a discussion with

Nathan Freier
Senior Fellow, Center for Strategic and International Studies

and

Barry Pavel
Director, Brent Scowcroft Center on International Security, The Atlantic Council

and

Lieutenant General James Dubik
U.S. Army (Ret.), Senior Fellow, Institute for the Study of War

and

Frank Hoffman
Senior Research Fellow, Institute for National Strategic Studies,
National Defense University

9. Drones and the Rule of Law and War, Wednesday May 1 / 10:00 am-11:15 am, Bipartisan Policy Center

Venue: Bipartisan policy Center, 1225 I Street, NW Suite 1000, Washington, D.C. 20005

Speakers: John Bellinger, Dafna Linzer, Hina Shamsi, Philip Zelikow

The Bipartisan Policy Center’s (BPC) Homeland Security Project will host a discussion convening legal and policy experts on the rule of law and war to discuss the use of drones and targeted killings. Join us as panelists evaluate issues like the current frameworks regarding the use of drones, the ramifications of a ‘drone court,’ the targeting of U.S. citizens abroad, and whether Congress should examine what these policies mean for the country.

Thomas Kean
Former Governor of New Jersey
Co-chair, 9/11 Commission
Co-chair, BPC Homeland Security Project

John Bellinger
Partner, Arnold & Porter LLP
Former Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State
Former Legal Adviser, National Security Council

Dafna Linzer
Managing Editor, MSNBC.com
Follow @DafnaLinzer

Hina Shamsi
Director, ACLU’s National Security Project
Follow @HinaShamsi

Philip Zelikow
Associate Dean, University of Virginia’s Graduate School of Arts & Sciences
Former Counselor, U.S. Department of State

John Farmer
Dean, Rutgers School of Law

For viewing purposes, we recommend the latest version of the following browsers: Google Chrome, Safari or Internet Explorer.

Having trouble viewing the webcast player below? Please click here.

If you are experiencing issues, please visit the webcast troubleshooter page here. Conduct a firewall test (see the side menu on the troubleshooter page) if the test video does not play.

Homeland Security Project

Website: http://bipartisanpolicy.org/events/20…

10. Afghanistan after 2014: Regional Impact, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Wednesday May 1/ 2pm-5pm, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.

Venue: Woodrow Wilson Center, 1300 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, D.C. 20004

Speakers: Noah Coburn, Marlène Laruelle, Simbal Khan

Spotlight on Central Eurasia Series //

This event explores local and regional perspectives on the future of Afghanistan against the backdrop of the planned NATO withdrawal of military forces from the region. The first session focuses on local politics and governance in Afghanistan, and the second session investigates the ways in which Afghanistan’s neighbors have been discussing and planning for the upcoming changes.

This event is free and open to the public but requires event registration. Please RSVP.

Cosponsored by the Woodrow Wilson Center’s Kennan Institute and Asia Program, and the Central Asia Program, George Washington University.

Speakers:

Noah Coburn, Professor, Bennington College, and author, ‘Bazaar Politics: Pottery and Power in an Afghan Market Town’ (2011)
Marlène Laruelle, Research Professor and Director, Central Asia Program, IERES, George Washington University
Simbal Khan, Director, Afghanistan and Central Asia, Institute for Strategic Studies, Islamabad, Pakistan

Website: http://www.wilsoncenter.org/event/afg…

11. The Strategic Environment in Southern Asia, Wednesday, May 1 / 3:30pm – 5:00pm, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

Venue: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 1779 Massachusetts Ave. NW, Washington, D.C. 20036

Speakers: Frederic Grare, C. Raja Mohan, C. Uday Bhaskar

The strategic environment in Southern Asia is rapidly changing. Over the next decade, the United States, China, and India will form a critical strategic triangle while the individual relationships of these three nations with ASEAN, Iran, and Pakistan will have significant regional and global implications. Although globalization will lead to more robust engagement among the major actors, this will inevitably result in dissonances that pose complex challenges in the southern Asian security domain. Please join Uday Bhaskar and C. Raja Mohan as they discuss the critical role of the United States and China in dealing with the delicate strategic framework in South Asia. Carnegie’s Frederic Grare will moderate.

Website: http://carnegieendowment.org/events/?…

12. The Nuclear Security Summit in 2014: Challenges and Opportunities, Thursday, May 2 / 9:00am – 10:30am, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace 

Venue: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace , 1779 Massachusetts Ave. NW, Washington, D.C. 20036

Speakers: Togzhan Kassenova, Piet De Klerk

Following the Nuclear Security Summits in Washington in 2010 and Seoul in 2012, the Netherlands will host the next summit in The Hague on March 24 and 25, 2014. The summit process, begun in 2010, is a response to growing awareness of the risk that weapons-usable fissile material might be acquired by non-state actors and terrorist groups. It seeks to further the goal of securing all nuclear material worldwide through engagement with key heads of state and international organizations. Please join Ambassador Piet de Klerk for a discussion of the continued importance of nuclear security, how the Summit in The Hague will build on the meetings in Washington and Seoul, challenges for the future, the expectations for 2014 and the Dutch role in this process. Togzhan Kassenova will moderate.

Website: http://carnegieendowment.org/events/?…

13. The Road to Damascus: U.S.-Turkish Cooperation Towards a Post-Assad Syria, Bipartisan Policy Center, Thursday, May 2 / 10:30am – 12:00pm 

Venue: Bipartisan Policy Center, 1225 I Street, NW Suite 1000, Washington, D.C. 20005

Speakers: Mort Abramowitz, Eric S. Edelman, Alan Makovsky

Ridding Syria of President Bashar al-Assad has been the goal of the United States for almost two years. Should this objective be achieved, however, an enormous challenge will still remain: stabilizing and rebuilding Syria in a way that advances U.S. strategic goals and values. However, this will require the cooperation of Turkey—a U.S. ally with keen interests in Syria. Ankara’s interests, however, do not perfectly match Washington’s, posing the challenge for policymakers of finding the right tools to align more closely the two countries’ visions of Syria’s future.

Join BPC as it announces the creation of its Turkey Task Force, co-chaired by former Ambassadors to Turkey Morton Abramowitz and Eric Edelman, and releases a paper on the opportunities and obstacles to U.S.-Turkish cooperation towards a post-Assad Syria.

Read the press release here.

Mort Abramowitz
Co-chair, BPC Turkey Task Force
Former U.S. Ambassador to Turkey

Ambassador Eric S. Edelman
Co-chair, BPC Turkey Task Force
Former Under Secretary of Defense for Policy
Former U.S. Ambassador to Turkey

Alan Makovsky
Senior Professional Staff Member, House Foreign Affairs Committee

Paula Dobriansky
Former Under Secretary of State for Democracy and Global Affairs

Press Release

Foreign Policy Project

Website: http://bipartisanpolicy.org/events/20…

14. Africa and The Global Arms Trade Treaty, Thursday, May 2 / 12:00pm – 2:00pm, Institute for Policy Studies,

Venue: Institute for Policy Studies, 1112 16th St. NW, Suite 600, Washington, D.C. 20036 Conference Room

Speakers: Rachel Stohl, Adotei Akwei

Join us for a remarkable panel discussion on the impact and future of the small arms trade in Africa.

Can an Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) help? How can world leaders and national governments both within and without Africa best help leverage the ATT to help deal with existing small arms violence and prevent violence in the future?

Join IPS’ Foreign Policy In Focus for a panel discussion examining the ATT and its implications for Africa with a specific focus on what the ATT is and what it is not, as well as what is next to help the treaty come in to force. Key areas of concern, such as conflict, commission of human rights abuses, the impact of the unauthorized/illicit arms sales on development and security in Africa will also be addressed.

Panelists:

Rachel Stohl, Senior Associate with Managing Across Boundaries initiative, Stimson Center and
Adotei Akwei, Managing Director for Government Relations, Amnesty International

Co-sponsors: Travis Roberts – Founder of Fight Back/Rebuilt campaign, Carl LeVan – IPS Associate Fellow and professor in the School of International Studies at American University, Estelle Bougna Fomeju – Senior at American University and Sciences Po Paris, Intern for IPS’ Foreign Policy in Focus.

Website: http://www.ips-dc.org/events/africa_a…

15. Turkey’s Peace Process, Thursday, May 2 / 3:00pm – 4:30pm, SETA Foundation at Washington DC

Venue: SETA Foundation at Washington, DC1025 Connecticut Avenue Northwest, Suite 1106, Washington, DC 20036

Speakers: Henri Barkey, Erol Cebeci, Kadir Ustun

Resolution of Turkey’s Kurdish question has been the subject of much debate. Today, there is more hope about the prospects of success than ever before with the ongoing peace talks with Abdullah Ocalan, the imprisoned leader of the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK). This latest attempt comes after previous initiatives such as the so-called “Democratic Opening” of 2009 and the following secret talks dubbed the “Oslo Process.” In the wake of heightened stakes in the Middle East, a possible end to PKK violence and resolution of the Kurdish question through democratic means could have dramatic implications for regional security and Turkey’s democratization. What are the possibilities and limits of finally resolving the Kurdish question?

Join us for a discussion with Henri Barkey, professor of international relations at Lehigh University, and Erol Cebeci, executive director of the SETA Foundation at Washington, DC, moderated by Kadir Ustun, research director at the SETA Foundation.

Website: http://setadc.org/events/50-upcoming-…

16. Israel’s Periphery Doctrine: Then and Now, Thursday, May 2 / 3:30pm – 4:30pm, International Institute for Strategic Studies 

Venue: International Institute for Strategic Studies, 2121 K Street, NWSuite 801

Speakers: Yossi Alpher

During its first three decades, Israel employed a grand strategy whereby it leapfrogged over the ring of hostile Arab neighboring states and forged partnerships with non-Arab and non-Muslim countries and minorities in the region.  Most well known are Israel’s alliances with Iran and Turkey and its aid to the Iraqi Kurds.  Beginning in the late 1970s, the peace process and the collapse of friendly periphery regimes rendered the doctrine of secondary importance.  Now, with Islamists and even Salafists threatening to surround Israel, is a new periphery strategy viable?

Yossi Alpher
Co-editor, The Bitterlemons Guide to the Arab Peace Initiative

17. The Way of the Knife, Friday, May 3 / 12:00pm – 1:00pm, Center for American Progress 

Venue: Center for American Progress, 1333 H Street NW, 10th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20005

Speakers: Mark Mazzetti, Ken Gude

In his most recent book, Mark Mazzetti argues that the most momentous change in American warfare over the past decade has taken place away from the battlefields of Afghanistan and Iraq in the corners of the world where large armies can’t go. The Way of the Knife is the untold story of that shadow war—a campaign that has blurred the lines between soldiers and spies and lowered the bar for waging war across the globe. The United States has pursued its enemies with armed drones and special operations troops, trained local assets to set up clandestine spying networks, and relied on mercurial dictators, untrustworthy foreign intelligence services, and proxy armies.

Please join us for a discussion with Pulitzer Prize-winning author Mark Mazzetti on his provocative new book.

Copies of The Way of the Knife will be available for purchase.
Featured author:
Mark Mazzetti, author, The Way of the Knife; correspondent, The New York Times

Moderated by:
Ken Gude, Chief of Staff, Vice President, Center for American Progress
A light lunch will be served at 11:30 a.m.

Website: http://www.americanprogress.org/event…

18. Post-2014 Afghanistan: Pakistan’s Concerns, Anxieties and Expectations: A Conversation with Ambassador Sherry Rehman, Friday, May 3 / 5:30pm – 7:00pm, Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies

Venue: Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies, 1619 Massachusetts Ave., N.W., Washington, D.C. Rome Auditorium

Speakers: Sherry Rehman

Pakistani Ambassador to the US will speak about post 2014 Afghanistan. Question and answer session to follow Ambassador’s remarks.

19. The Dispensable Nation: American Foreign Policy in Retreat, Friday, May 3 / 7:00pm – 8:00pm, Politics and Prose 

Venue: Politics and Prose, 5015 Connecticut Ave., N.W., Washington, D.C. 20008

Speakers: Vali Nasr

As senior advisor to Richard Holbrooke from 2009 to 2011, Nasr, dean of SAIS and author of The Shia Revival, witnessed both how the Obama administration made its foreign policy and how these decisions played out abroad. His book finds that Obama failed to chart a new course in the Middle East, and warns that the next Arab Spring may be an angry uprising against America.

Website: http://www.politics-prose.com/event/b…

Tags : , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Turkey: rising influence, eroding freedoms

Turkey has been talking the talk of democratic reform, but has not been walking the walk. This was the conclusion reached on Friday afternoon as the Project on Middle East Democracy (POMED) gathered to discuss Turkey’s contradictory position as a leader of democracy in the region, while still struggling with human rights abuses and suppressing freedom of expression.

Moderator Susan Corke of Freedom House optimistically introduced the topic, claiming this is a moment of opportunity and positive transformation in Turkey. The Turkish government has been progressively addressing serious issues such as constitutional reform, peace the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) and improved relations with Iraqi Kurdistan. Despite this hopeful tone, Turkey needs to fulfill its democratic promise by becoming more aware of its problems with societal inclusion and suppression of free speech.

Howard Eissenstat, professor at St. Lawrence University, emphasized the need to center the conversation on human rights issues in Turkey.  Turkey has a successful economy, educational system and democratic institutions but still harbors grave faults. He elaborated on three of Turkey’s biggest problems:

  1. Turkish democracy is illiberal.  A culture of militarism and hesitancy about diversity reinforce this. Progress has been made on societal inclusion, but Armenians and Kurds do not feel like full members of society.  
  2. Prime Minister Erdogan and his party (AKP) have created a powerful political machine. Its political success is so great that Turkish democracy lacks a legitimate opposition party. The AKP’s dominance and political patronage is stunting Turkish democracy.
  3. International pressure, not domestic requirements, drives reform.  Turkey continues to pass laws to protect freedom of expression, religion and the press, with the government instituting multiple reform packages. The motive however is not an intrinsic desire for reform, but rather international acceptance.

Turkey has a big appetite for reform legislation, but actual practice is minimalist.

Yigal Schleifer, an independent journalist and analyst, explained how Turkey’s faults affect its  relations with the wider region.  The AKP portrays itself as the fresh face of reform but in reality it has been in power for so long that it has become the big state that it once fought against.

The AKP has reinvented its foreign policy in the past few years. Relations with the US are less rocky, the relationship with NATO has been renewed and, most significantly, negotiation with the Kurds continues.  The underlying interest is stronger and safer ties to the US and other Western allies.

Continuation of the EU accession process is important. Despite the waning prospects for Turkey to join the EU, the process is an engine for reform that helps Turkey and the EU grow politically and diplomatically. 

How should the US and allies help Turkey fulfill its democratic promise?

Eissenstat stressed that the US should push Turkey to adopt more inclusive reform packages that protect freedom of expression.  Erdogan’s brusque personality and strong sense of honor partially account for the large number of defamation cases that activists and journalist face.  President Obama should use his good relationship with Erdogan to criticize the AKP’s restrictive policies and to push for serious reforms. Corke noted that if Turkey wants to be an international player, they need a thicker skin for criticism.

Tags : ,

Civilians >> chemical weapons

The “Salon” I did with Stanford’s Lina Khatib yesterday on “Should the U.S. intervene in Syria?” focused mainly on chemical weapons, as all conversations about Syria yesterday did.

Lina, who had published a piece with Larry Diamond on Thursday making the case for military intervention (arms to the rebels plus a no-fly zone but no boots on the ground) in Syria, is concerned not only about chemical weapons use, the evidence for which she regards as “credible,” but about the fertile ground for Islamist extremists and the impact on the region.  The longer the fighting lasts, the worse it gets.

I don’t disagree with any of that.  But it doesn’t matter whether she and I think the evidence of chemical weapons use is credible.  What matters is what the Russians, Chinese, Turks and others think.  If there is going to be serious military intervention in Syria by the United States, it is going to need multilateral cover, preferably a UN Security Council resolution as well as an Arab League request.  The standards the evidence is going to need to meet are high.  The world is in no mood for another Middle East war based on flimsy claims related to weapons of mass destruction.

It is going to take time to assemble the evidence and convince skeptics.  Once we are ready, Peter Juul proposes a reasonable course of action to mobilize the UN Security Council and NATO (for both military action and humanitarian relief).  If that fails, the US will have to consider unilateral action without multilateral cover, but that is a course of action with many drawbacks.

There is also a credibility issue in the other direction:  if the US doesn’t act against Syrian use of chemical weapons, why would the Iranians believe that we would take action against their nuclear program?  This is a serious problem, but it should not drive the timetable.  Being 100% certain, and trying to convince others, is more important than the timing.

That is a cruel thing to say.  Syrians are dying every day.  The average is climbing towards 200 per day, 6000 per month.  The total by now is well over 70,000.  Those are staggering numbers.  Few of them are killed by chemical weapons.  Bombing, Scuds, artillery and small arms fire are much more common:

The targeting of civilians is a war crime, no matter what the weapons used.  Civilians are more important than the weapons that kill them.  The standards of proof are easily met.  The Syrian security forces and their paramilitaries are attacking and killing civilians daily with conventional weapons.

I would like to see the international community act on those grounds, rather than focusing on a limited (and difficult to prove) use of sarin gas.  But this is not the unipolar moment of 1999, when the United States led a NATO intervention in Kosovo without UN Security Council approval.  That is unlikely to happen.  So we are heading down a long road of difficult proof.

Some, like Leila Hilal on Chris Hayes’ show last night, would prefer a negotiated solution.  So would I.  But it is not looking as if Bashar al Assad is hurting badly enough to yield to the transition plans that Russia and the United States agreed in Geneva last June.  The mutually hurting stalemate that would provide the conditions for that will require that the revolutionaries do a bit better than they have managed so far.  More international assistance is going to be needed.

Tags : , , , , , ,
Tweet